Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul;41(7):2827–2834. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.7.2827-2834.2003

TABLE 5.

Comparison of HPV16 VLP serology in young women

Parameter Variables and findings of:
Carter et al. (6) Viscidi et al. (36) Present study
Study population, U.S. State Female university students, Washington Female graduate and undergraduate students, Maryland Female college students, New Jersey
No. of subjects at baseline 293 376 575
Mean age (yr [range]) 19 (18-20) 22 (18-40) 20 ± 3a
HPV DNA data (no. [%])
    Negative 216 (74) 247 (66) 422 (73)
    Positive 58 (20) 101 (27) 132 (23)
    HPV16 DNA positive 19 (6) 28 (7) 21 (4)
ELISA procedure
    Type Capture, H16.V5 MAb based Direct Direct
    Antigen HPV16 L1 VLP (produced by recombinant vaccinia virus, CsCl purified) HPV16 L1/L2 VLP (produced by recombinant baculovirus, CsCl purified) HPV16 L1/L2 VLP (produced by recombinant baculovirus, CsCl purified)
    Antigen concn (ng/well), treatment NAb 500, overnight at 4°C 50, overnight at 4°C
    Blocking agent 1× PBS-0.05% Tween 20-0.5% nonfat milk 1× PBS-0.05% Tween 20-0.5% nonfat milk 1× PBS-0.5% PVA
    Primary antibody dilution 1:100 1:10 1:100
    Detection system APc-p-nitrophenyl phosphate disodium hexahydrate HRP-ABTS-H2O2 HRP-ABTS-H2O2
    Cutoff OD value 0.259 0.166 0.16
    Subtracted value (definition) OD of each tested serum reacted with no VLP well OD of each tested serum reacted with VLP disrupted in carbonate buffer OD of control human serum reacted with no VLP well (OD = 0.025 to 0.05)
ELISA results for IgG (%)
    Seroprevalence 9.5 24 14
    HPV DNA negative 6.9 19 8.7
    HPV DNA positive 5.2 30 23.8
    HPV16 DNA positive 52.6 46 52.4
a

Mean ± standard deviation.

b

NA, not applicable.

c

AP, alkaline phosphatase.