Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1977 Jan;67(1):23–29. doi: 10.2105/ajph.67.1.23

Interest-group representation and the HSAs: health planning and political theory.

B C Vladeck
PMCID: PMC1653585  PMID: 831558

Abstract

Examination of the provisions of the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act, P.L. 93-641, concerning the composition of Health Systems Agencies, which are to be the primary building-blocks of local health planning, suggests that expectations of substantial change may be unrealistic. Specifically, in its provision for representation on the HSAs, Congress appears to have been accepting an implicit theory of pluralist interest-group representation that has long been prevalent in other sectors of public life in the United States, and long subject to significant criticism. Such forms of representation tend to lead to bargaining, log-rolling, and collusive competition among narrowly-defined special interests, with the interests of the broader general public less well-served. The application of this theory to health planning in P.L. 93-641 is examined, and predictions drawn about the implications of this analysis for health planning and health policy in the United States in general.

Full text

PDF
25

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Mason H. R. Letters to the Editor: On Miller and Pickett commentaries thrust from Mason. Am J Public Health. 1976 May;66(5):501–502. doi: 10.2105/ajph.66.5.501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Miller C. A. Issues of health policy: local government and the public's health. Am J Public Health. 1975 Dec;65(12):1330–1335. doi: 10.2105/ajph.65.12.1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Peterson R. L. The designation of health service areas. Public Health Rep. 1976 Jan-Feb;91(1):9–18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pickett G. Toward a national health policy--values in conflict. Am J Public Health. 1975 Dec;65(12):1335–1338. doi: 10.2105/ajph.65.12.1335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Robbins A. Who should make public policy for health? Am J Public Health. 1976 May;66(5):431–431. doi: 10.2105/ajph.66.5.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rosenfeld L. S., Rosenfeld I. National health planning in the United States: prospects and portents. Int J Health Serv. 1975;5(3):441–453. doi: 10.2190/15FV-45UC-KED5-4JV4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES