Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 8;1:41. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-1-41

Table 1.

Survival associated tissue-section-based prognostic factors and lymph node status in breast cancer.

Prognosticator N Age range or median Country Methods Stage/LN status of all patients Stength of association (survival %)* P value, type of analysis Mean or median follow-up (months) Reference
LN+ patients
AgNOR 164 N.A. Italy MA N-, N+ DFS (42,61) 0.0093 M 108 Derenzini90
Bcl-2 107 56 Belgium IHC N-, N+ DFS (21,62) <0.001 U 91 Hellemans55
CD44 74 62 Finland IHC N-, N+ DSS (45,56) 0.02 U 84 Joensuu158
E-cadherin 57 59 Finland IHC N-, N+ OS (36,88) 0.0001 U 66.5 Elzagheid150
EGFR 404 53.4 Japan IHC N-, N+ DFS (50,75) <0.0001 U 46 Tsutsui110
ER 705 54 UK IHC I-IV DFS, ReR 0.651 0.004 M 62 Rehim122
HER2/neu 106 59 Finland IHC N-, N+ OS (13,80) 0.001 U 67.2 Jalava16
IGF-1 98 57.1 Finland IHC N-, N+ OS (16,35) 0.0286 U 169.2 Toropainen115
Mitoses 131 59 Finland SMI N-, N+ RR 3.5 0.0005 U 69 Kronqvist71
Mitoses 368 25–81 MC MAI N+ OS (57,83) 0.00003 U 60 Simpson68
P21 328 N.A. USA IHC N-, N+ DFS, X2 74.61 0.054 M 195.6 Thor 37
PgR 106 58 Finland IHC N-, N+ N.A. 0.0186 70 Jalava 123
SPF 257 25–81 MC FCM N+ OS (70,82) 0.026 U 60 Simpson68
LN- patients
Ploidy 50 56 UK FCM N- DFS (32,71) <0.0001 U >120 Yuan132
Cathepsin D 262 60 Finland IHC N- DFS (47,68) <0.0001 U 98.4 Isola100
CD44 237 56 Holland IHC N-, N+ DFS (50,75) 0.005 U 84 Foekens156
EGFR 618 53.4 Japan IHC N-, N+ DFS, ReR 2.05 0.0241 M 46 Tsutsui110
HER2/neu 324 N.A. USA FISH N- DFS (57,75) 0.0077 U 50 Press17
HER2/neu 224 59 Finland IHC N-, N+ N.A. N.S. 67.2 Jalava16
Ki-67 89 60.5 Finland IHC N-, N+ OS (50,70) 0.0297 U 103.2 Pietilainen78
Mitoses 516 <55 MC MAI N- DFS (62,85) <0.00001U 118 Baak69
Mitoses 232 59 Finland SMI N-, N+ RR 4.2 0.0007 U 69 Kronqvist71
P27 75 <65 Canada IHC N-, N+ DSS, ReR 0.24 0.03 M 180 Foulkes47
P53 700 <50 USA IHC N- DFS (53,85) 0.0001U 54 Allred33
PCNA 205 60.5 Finland IHC N- DFS (56,80) 0.0003 U 141.6 Aaltomaa84
SPF 180 N.A. China N.A. N- N.A. <0.001 60 Zhang 96

Prognosticators for LN+ patients are presented first followed by those for LN- patients. The database applied was PubMed, the presented papers were published during years 1991–2005. The most significant p-values with defined survival characteristics for each marker are shown. P-values are not comparable with each other in absolute terms because also the size of the sample influences the p value. The value of prognosticators can only be compared reliably by comparing different prognosticators in the same patient material.

* The figures within the parantheses refer to the survival of 2 cutpoint-associated patient groups after median follow up. IHC, immunohistochemistry; N-, node negative; N+, node positive; MA, morphometric analysis; FCM, flow-cytometry; NA, not available; MC, multicenter study; SMI, standardized mitotic index; MAI, mitotic activity index; OS, overall survival; DFS, disease free survival; DSS, disease specific survival; RR, risk ratio; ReR, relative risk; X2, Chi square;, FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; N.S, not significant; M, multivariate; U, univariate.