Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov-Dec;13(6):619–626. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2103

Table 3.

Table 3. Use of Handheld Computer Clinical Reference Software: Self-reported Estimates Compared to Actual Usage Patterns

Reported Average Use of Clinical Reference Actual Tracked Use of Clinical Reference
Respondents ∗∗n (%) Mean n (SD) Median n Spearman Correlation
Pharmacopeia use for drug information lookups per day∗∗∗ r = 0.36; p < 0.0001
None 2 (0.2) 3.3 (3.2) 3.3
1–2 283 (23) 3.7 (9.2) 2
3–5 402 (32) 5.1 (8.5) 2.7
6–10 250 (20) 7.7 (14.5) 3.8
More than 10 312 (25) 9.1 (16.1) 4.2
Total 1249 6.3 (12.4) 2.9
Pharmacopeia use of the drug-drug interaction tool in the prior 4 weeks r = 0.50; p < 0.0001
None 175 (14) 0.13 (1.3) 0
1–2 321 (26) 0.80 (2.0) 0
3–5 276 (22) 2.5 (4.7) 1
6–10 199 (16) 3.3 (4.6) 2
More than 10 274 (22) 7.5 (10.7) 4
Total 1245 2.9 (6.4) 0
Diagnostic and therapeutic information resource use in the prior 4 weeks r = 0.49; p < 0.0001
None 29 (10) 2.1 (1.9) 1
1–2 70 (25) 4.1 (4.3) 3
3–5 72 (26) 6.9 (7.6) 4
6–10 58 (21) 9.1 (10.1) 6
More than 10 46 (16) 18.7 (27.5) 12
Total 275 8.4 (14) 14

Actual usage patterns were collected by synchronization of the handheld computer to track the prior 4 weeks of clinical reference software data use.

∗∗ Of the 1501 survey respondents, 1249 (83%) had synchronized their HCs in the prior 4 weeks and included 275 (61%) of the 453 subscribers to the Dx guide.

∗∗∗ On average, the clinical reference software was used on 13 of the 28 days. For each physician, the daily use was calculated by dividing their 28-day total usage by the number of days he/she used any of the clinical references.