Skip to main content
. 2000 Jun 13;97(13):7556–7560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.110142097

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Human psychophysical length-discrimination measurements of visual masking effects from 23 human subjects using overlapping opaque masks of varied size (the mask's edge distance from the target's edge was 0°, 0.5°, 1°, 2°, or 4° as indicated in the Inset on the Right). The subject's task was to fixate on the central black dot and choose the longer target (Right or Left). Targets were black bars presented for 30 ms in duration, and masks were also black and presented for 50 ms: the subject's task was to fixate on the central black dot and choose the longer target (Right or Left). Targets turned on at time 0 ms, and masks were presented at various onset asynchronies so that they came on before, simultaneous to, or after the target in 20-ms steps. Stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) to the left of zero indicate forward masking conditions, and SOAs that are greater than zero indicate backward masking. Miniature gray markers with dotted connecting lines represent conditions during which the target and mask overlapped in time, and so the target was partially or completely hidden by the mask. The targets were 0.5° wide and had varied heights (5.5°, 5.0°, or 4.5°) and were placed 3° from the 0.2°-wide circular fixation dot in the center of the screen. The mask was a bar 6° tall with varied widths, spatially overlapped, and centered over each target. There were 540 various types of trials (2 possible choices × 2 differently sized target sets to foil local cue discrimination strategies × 5 various overlapping mask sizes × 27 stimulus onset asynchronies). Each condition was presented in random order five times to each subject, over a period of 2 days, for a total of 62,100 trials (summed over all 23 subjects).