Skip to main content
. 2003 May 27;100(12):7283–7288. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1237725100

Table 1. Effects of probucol on plasma UC and TC.

Genotype/drug treatment UC, mg/dl TC, mg/dl Ratio (UC/TC)
DKO
None (n = 11) 781 ± 65* 970 ± 83* 0.806 ± 0.007*
Probucol (n = 10) 151 ± 21 456 ± 45 0.318 ± 0.013
SR-BI+/- apoE KO
None (n = 5) 124 ± 11§ 421 ± 31 0.296 ± 0.012
Probucol (n = 5) 57 ± 3 244 ± 20 0.238 ± 0.015
apoE KO
None (n = 5) 126 ± 14§ 433 ± 66 0.291 ± 0.02
Probucol (n = 3) 69 ± 6 249 ± 8 0.277 ± 0.02
SR-BI KO**
None (n = 13) 108 ± 5 211 ± 6 0.515 ± .027
Probucol (n = 13) 24 ± 2 110 ± 6 0.218 ± .012
WT control**
None (n = 7) 33 ± 2 103 ± 4 0.315 ± .011
Probucol (n = 7) 8 ± 2 34 ± 4 0.222 ± .033

Data are represented as mean ± standard error

*

P < 0.0001, compared with all the other groups with ANOVA test. Pvalues for ttest comparison with or without probucol treatment

, <0.0001

, <0.020

§

, <0.0003

, <0.0031

, <0.35

**

Blood samples from 4- to 5-week-old animals fed a low-fat chow diet were drawn, the same animals were fed a probucol supplemented diet for an additional 7-25 days, and a second set of samples was drawn (TC data are from ref. 35)