Skip to main content
. 2003 Jul 26;327(7408):195. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7408.195

Table 1.

Summary of the eight studies included in the systematic review

Study Quality rating* No of sites/doctors Individual patient data Median (IQR) CPS (days) Median (IQR) AS (days) Rank correlation Weighted κ
(1) Parkes, 19723 C 1/? 71 28 (24-56) 21 (9-34) 0.49 0.31
(2) Evans, 198515 C 1/6 42 81 (28-182) 120 (43-180) 0.69 0.40
(3) Heyse-Moore, 198716 C 1/? 50 56 (33-84) 14 (7-28) 0.26 0.06
(4) Maltoni, 199413 B1 1/4 100 42 (28-56) 32 (13-63) 0.60 0.34
(5) Maltoni, 19958 B1 22/? 530 42 (28-70) 32 (13-62) 0.70 0.44
(6) Oxenham, 199821 C 1/5 21 21 (14-35) 15 (9-25) 0.73 0.52
(7) Maltoni, 199914 B1 14/? 451 42 (21-70) 33 (14-62) 0.70 0.44
(8) Christakis, 20004 B1 5/343 326 77 (28-133) 24 (12-58) 0.50 0.25
Overall 1591 42 (28-84) 29 (13-62) 0.60 0.36

AS=actual survival; CPS=clinical prediction of survival; IQR=interquartile range; ?=number of clinicians making predictions either not published or not known.

*

According to MERGE document: B1=low-moderate risk of bias; C=high risk of bias.6

Included 36 patients who were censored (that is, still alive).