Skip to main content
. 2003 Jun 25;100(14):8372–8377. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1533209100

Table 2. Flow cytometric analysis of selected T cell surface markers before and after two treatment cycles.

HLA-DR+
CD45RO+
CD69+
CD4+CD25+
CD25+
CTLA-4+
Patient Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post
% of CD3+CD4+ % of CD3+CD4+ % of CD3+CD4+ % of CD3+ % of CD4+ % of CD4+CD25+
1 17.5 41.8 85.4 88.9 4.6 4.3 15.9 11.4 41.8 35.0 0.4 2.5
3 5.2 17.3 78.8 82.2 1.7 3.4 19.5 10.7 34.6 26.7 3.0 1.1
5 17.6 29.2 77.2 84.6 2.8 1.5 19.0 18.2 42.3 36.4 2.0 1.1
6 31.3 42.5 98.9 99.0 4.4 3.1 14.3 13.5 46.3 35.8 1.5 0.6
7 6.2 20.3 57.0 72.9 1.4 2.0 14.1 23.8 26.7 40.8 0.4 2.4
10 9.8 22.7 85.7 94.3 2.4 3.6 23.4 19.4 46.5 35.5 0.2 1.7
11 6.2 12.2 95.2 89.6 9.8 1.7 21.2 17.6 43.3 25.4 0.0 0.6
12 3.9 31.7 73.7 76.4 1.5 3.9 10.1 11.1 19.9 26.0 0.2 5.5
14 7.9 39.4 72.4 89.4 2.3 6.1 12.8 7.0 28.9 20.5 0.6 2.5
Mean Δ ± SEM
+16.8 ± 2.9 (P = 0.0004)
+5.9 ± 2.4 (P = 0.04)
-0.1 ± 1.1 (P = 0.9)
-1.9 ± 1.8 (P = 0.3)
-5.4 ± 3.2 (P = 0.13)
+1.1 ± 0.7 (P = 0.17)
% of CD3+CD4- %of CD3+CD4- % of CD3+CD4-
1 30.5 57.9 66.1 69.0 7.7 6.8
3 14.8 22.3 52.4 58.8 3.6 3.9
5 28.9 31.3 53.8 55.8 4.3 2.7
6 78.0 67.4 51.3 61.4 12.5 8.2
7 12.3 13.3 52.9 43.7 6.7 2.5
10 29.6 44.3 80.2 82.0 2.1 7.8
11 4.9 18.2 77.6 70.4 8.1 7.4
12 8.4 35.8 69.6 72.1 3.8 8.9
14 14.1 20.7 57.9 60.9 7.0 7.6
Mean Δ ± SEM +10.0 ± 4.1 (P = 0.04) +1.4 ± 2.0 (P = 0.51) 0.0 ± 1.2 (P = 1.0)

Values compared by using paired t test