Skip to main content
. 2000 Jul 5;97(14):7894–7898. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.14.7894

Table 1.

Observed and predicted values of δ18Owl for bulk leaf water

Plant Observed δ18Owl, ‰ Craig–Gordon-predicted δ18Owl, ‰
Agropyron desertorum (C3) 7.7  ± 1.6 7.8
Agrostis stolonifera (C3) 9.2  ± 2.8 8.1
Alopecurus pratensis (C3) 8.3  ± 3.6 7.6
Bromus inermis (C3) 8.2  ± 1.7 7.6
Lolium multiflorum (C3) 8.0  ± 1.2 7.8
Andropogon gerardii (C4) 15.1  ± 3.7 8.0
Bouteloua curtipendula (C4) 12.7  ± 0.3 7.6
Eragrostis curvula (C4) 12.4  ± 4.2 8.0
Leptochloa dubia (C4) 14.2  ± 2.8 7.8
Muhlenbergia wrightii (C4) 9.0  ± 2.6 8.1
C3 mean 8.3  ± 0.5a 7.8
C4 mean 12.6  ± 3.2b 7.8

Each value represents a mean of three plants and the associated standard deviation. C3 and C4 means are significantly different at P < 0.01. Predicted δ18Owl values (SMOW scale) are based on a single-water-source Craig–Gordon model. Sample conditions were: δ18Oatm w vapor = −27‰; relative humidity = 35%; air temperature = 25°C; leaf temperatures varied but were not significantly different from the mean of 27°C. Sample conditions for pilot experiment (data in text): δ18Oatm w vapor = −24‰; δ18Osource = −15.6‰; relative humidity = 40%; air temperature = 35°C; leaf temperatures were C3 dicot = 34°C, C3 grass = 35°C, and C4 grass = 37°C.