Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 6;6:272. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-272

Table 2.

Logistic regression of intention to adhere to recommendations for follow-up after an hypothetical abnormal FOBT result (n = 288)

Bivariate analyses Multivariate analyses


respondents crude adjusteda



Variables range or category % or mean(SD) OR(95%CI) p value OR(95%CI) p value
Intention high 74.7
Perceived barriers
 Misperception regarding the necessity of follow-up
  CDE are not necessary unless symptomatic 1 – 5 1.8(1.2) 0.70(0.56–0.87) 0.002 0.67(0.53–0.85) 0.001
  CDE are not necessary for my age 1 – 5 1.7(1.1) 0.64(0.51–0.81) < 0.001 0.60(0.47–0.77) < 0.001
 Discomfort with the CDE procedure
  Having CDE would be embarrassing 1 – 5 2.8(1.5) 0.85(0.70–1.02) 0.072 0.76(0.62–0.94) 0.010
  Bowel preparation for the CDE is too difficult 1 – 5 3.8(1.3) 1.11(0.90–1.37) 0.316 1.06(0.85–1.33) 0.589
  Having CDE would be uncomfortable 1 – 5 3.6(1.4) 0.97(0.80–1.18) 0.763 0.91(0.73–1.13) 0.403
  Having CDE would be painful 1 – 5 3.6(1.4) 0.98(0.81–1.20) 0.870 0.91(0.73–1.13) 0.410
 Psychological costs
  I will feel uncomfortable talking about CRC 1 – 5 2.7(1.4) 0.84(0.69–1.02) 0.073 0.80(0.65–0.99) 0.037
  I am afraid of finding cancer 1 – 5 3.5(1.4) 0.92(0.76–1.12) 0.435 0.86(0.72–1.09) 0.250
 Practical barriers
  I am too busy to undertake follow-up examinations 1 – 5 1.8(1.1) 0.54(0.42–0.70) < 0.001 0.48(0.36–0.63) < 0.001
  I have other things to do that are more important than undertaking follow-up examinations 1 – 5 1.4(0.9) 0.59(0.44–0.79) < 0.001 0.56(0.41–0.76) < 0.001
  Having CDE would cost too much money 1 – 5 1.8(1.1) 0.75(0.59–0.95) 0.016 0.71(0.54–0.92) 0.009
Perceived benefits 6 – 30 25.0(5.5) 1.07(1.02–1.12) 0.008 1.06(1.02–1.12) 0.010
Perceived susceptibility 3 – 15 6.3(2.7) 1.02(0.92–1.12) 0.744 1.05(0.94–1.17) 0.377
Perceived severity 6 – 30 19.0(5.9) 1.04(1.00–1.09) 0.071 1.05(0.99–1.10) 0.094
Knowledge of CRC risk factorsb
 Blood relative with CRC correct 77.1 2.04(1.10–3.77) 0.023 2.06(1.07–4.12) 0.030
 Low fiber diet correct 91.5 2.49(1.04–5.96) 0.041 2.72(1.07–6.90) 0.035
 High fat diet correct 85.6 1.52(0.74–3.14) 0.258 1.33(0.60–2.95) 0.491
 Increasing age correct 45.8 1.20(0.69–2.07) 0.515 1.22(0.69–2.12) 0.486
Social supportc
 Health care professionals yes 55.9 1.12(0.65–1.92) 0.695 1.15(0.65–2.05) 0.633
 Family members yes 53.1 1.04(0.59–1.85) 0.884 0.96(0.53–1.75) 0.902

Note: OR: odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CDE, complete diagnostic evaluation; CRC, colorectal cancer; FOBT, fecal occult blood test.

a adjusted for age, gender, marital status, education, economic status, trait anxiety, bowel symptoms, family history of CRC, and past FOBT screening. b correct vs. else. c yes vs. not.

For the scales, the OR estimate the change in odds of intention that is associated with a change of one scale point.

The OR described the associated of each psychosocial variable and intention respectively.