Skip to main content
. 2004 May 21;558(Pt 3):963–974. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.062299

Table 2.

Effects of nNOS inhibition on HR responses (A, beats min−1) or interbeat interval changes (B, ms) to vagal nerve stimulation in isolated atria in vitro

A. Wild-type nNOS+/−


−EX +EX −EX +EX




Con Ad.eGFP Ad.nNOS Con Ad.eGFP Ad.nNOS Con Ad.eGFP Ad.nNOS Con Ad.eGFP Ad.nNOS
Control
 3 Hz 50 44 123 99 76 126 58 60 139 48 55 137
± 5 ± 4 ± 12* ± 11** ± 3** ± 8* ± 8 ± 10 ± 36* ± 8 ± 3 ± 10*
 5 Hz 89 82 159 112 125 192 86 92 153 85 92 202
± 6 ± 5 ± 20* ± 11** ± 8** ± 13* ± 7 ± 10 ± 35* ± 16 ± 3 ± 12*
l-VNIO
 3 Hz 44 31 59 53 51 59 51 40 40 39 50 57
± 5** ± 8** ± 9** ± 17** ± 4** ± 8** ± 7** ± 5** ± 10** ± 7** ± 6** ± 5**
 5 Hz 66 53 78 67 81 86 78 84 75 70 76 91
± 12** ± 17** ± 17** ± 10** ± 4** ± 7** ± 4** ± 11** ± 23** ± 13** ± 5** ± 7**
l-Arg
 3 Hz 48 62 107 96 82 98 55 59 108 53 58 96
± 3 ± 11 ± 5* ± 13** ± 11** ± 6* ± 4 ± 6 ± 24* ± 10** ± 5 ± 17*
 5 Hz 83 103 140 103 107 132 83 98 116 80 89 147
± 5 ± 10 ± 40* ± 8** ± 11** ± 11* ± 7 ± 8 ± 20* ± 12** ± 4 ± 22*
Baseline HR (beats min−1)
376 371 378 350 349 367 383 398 388 354 379 347
± 25 ± 18 ± 29 ± 19 ± 33 ± 30 ± 20 ± 29 ± 25 ± 23 ± 34 ± 32













B. Wild-type nNOS+/−


−EX +EX −EX +EX




Con Ad.eGFP Ad.nNOS Con Ad.eGFP Ad.nNOS Con Ad.eGFP Ad.nNOS Con Ad.eGFP Ad.nNOS
Control
 3 Hz 34 31 87 69 49 99 28 29 89 27 32 108
± 2 ± 1 ± 5* ± 7** ± 3** ± 5* ± 3 ± 4 ± 16* ± 4 ± 2 ± 5*
 5 Hz 59 54 127 82 97 210 45 49 104 54 60 226
± 2 ± 2 ± 9* ± 7** ± 5** ± 8* ± 3 ± 4 ± 15* ± 9 ± 2 ± 6*
l-VNIO
 3 Hz 31 24 39 32 31 36 24 18 18 21 28 33
± 12 ± 13 ± 13 ± 10 ± 3 ± 5 ± 3 ± 2 ± 4 ± 4 ± 3 ± 3
 5 Hz 44 36 51 42 53 57 40 44 38 42 47 59
± 15 ± 17 ± 17 ± 6 ± 3 ± 5 ± 1 ± 4 ± 10 ± 7 ± 3 ± 4
l-Arg
 3 Hz 32 41 73 66 54 68 26 28 61 30 34 64
± 1 ± 4 ± 2* ± 8** ± 7** ± 4* ± 1 ± 2 ± 10* ± 5 ± 3 ± 9*
 5 Hz 55 70 104 73 77 105 43 54 68 50 57 121
± 2 ± 4 ± 2* ± 5** ± 7** ± 7* ± 3 ± 3 ± 8* ± 6 ± 2 ± 12*

In vitro atrial beating rate responses to vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) at 3 and 5 Hz stimulation frequencies. Part A shows rate responses calculated as beats per minute change and part B shows responses expressed as change in contraction interval (ms). Control responses were significantly increased in trained (+EX) compared to untrained (−EX) in wild-type tissue

(**

P < 0.05, unpaired t test), although this effect was not present in atria from mice lacking one allele of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS+/−). Gene transfer using adenoviruses containing nNOS (Ad.nNOS) increased responses to VNS in all atria compared to gene transfer using adenoviruses containing enhanced green fluorescent protein (Ad.eGFP) and control (Con, no gene transfer) atria

(*

P < 0.01, unpaired t test). Selective nNOS inhibition with vinyl-l-N-5-(1-imino-3-butenyl)-l-ornithine (l-VNIO, 100 µmol l−1) attenuated the response to nerve stimulation in all atria, and abolished the effects of training and Ad.nNOS treatment. This effect was reversed in all cases with l-arginine l-Arg, 1 mmol l−1,

P < 0.05, repeated measures ANOVA.