Skip to main content
. 2004 Jun 4;558(Pt 3):745–757. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.066845

Table 1.

Summarized data of effect of some P2 agonists and antagonists on sEPSC and sIPSC frequency

Agonist sEPSC sIPSC No change Total n




(100 μm) % (n) Fold % (n) Fold % (n)
 ATPγS 41 (70) 10.7 ± 3.7** 20 (33) 4.0 ± 1.0** 47 (79) 169
 ATP 56 (9) 9.9 ± 5.4* 25 (4) 4.3 ± 1.7* 38  (6) 16
 α,β-meATP 50 (7) 13.3 ± 7.0* 29 (4) 4.5 ± 1.7* 36  (5) 15
l-β,γ-meATP 0 19 (5) 4.0 ± 0.8** 81 (21) 26
 UTP 0 0 100  (9) 9
 UDP 0 0 100  (9) 9
 ADP 0 0 100  (9) 9
ATPγS +
 TTX 0 24 (4) 5.4 ± 1.3** 76 (13) 17
 TTX, low [Ca2+]o 0 0 100 (16) 16
 Adenosine 60 (6) 9.2 ± 3.7* 30 (3) 3.8 ± 1.8* 30  (3) 10
 Suramin 0 0 100 (11) 11
 Suramin washout 55 (6) 10.8 ± 0.5* 27 (3) 4.0 ± 0.2* 36  (4) 11
 PPADS 0 100  (5) 5
 A-317491 0 100  (4) 4

Data show percentages and numbers (n) of neurones responding, and increases in frequency of sEPSCs and sIPSCs relative to control (Fold). Fold data shown as mean ± s.e.m. of effective cells only. No change means that change is less than 1.5-fold of control. (The data for sEPSC and sIPSC included the number of neurones in which both sEPSC and sIPSC frequency was increased).

**

P < 0.01

*

P < 0.05, Dunnett's multiple test.