Skip to main content
. 2003 Mar 26;557(Pt 2):689–700. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.059808

Figure 6. Effects of LICI on CBI in a single subject.

Figure 6

Traces represent the averaged waveform for a single subject. A, response to TS 0.5 mV alone (condition 3A). B, CBI alone. A cerebellar conditioning stimulus (CCS5) inhibited the test response (condition 3B) compared to A. The TS was the same as in A. C, LICI alone. A conditioning stimulus (CS100) using a TS that evokes a 0.5 mV MEP if preceded by a CS100 stimulus (i.e. TS 0.5 mVCS100; condition 3F). The test MEP amplitude here is matched with that in A. D, combined LICI and CBI (condition 3G). Using both CS100 and CCS5 conditioning stimuli caused MEP facilitation compared to that shown in B and C.