Skip to main content
. 2004 Sep 30;561(Pt 1):331–338. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.072843

Figure 2. Comparisons of the effect of conditioning TMS over dPM, M1 and DLPFC at an intensity of 90% RMT (A, n = 10) or 110% RMT (B, n = 10) and a comparison of the effects of right–left conditioning TMS over dPM on the contralateral M1 (C, n = 8).

Figure 2

Significant differences are indicated by * (P < 0.05) or ** (P < 0.01).