Skip to main content
. 2004 Sep 2;561(Pt 1):91–108. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.072546

Figure 2. The development of synaptic resistance to depotentiation stimulation is dependent on protein synthesis but not mRNA synthesis.

Figure 2

A, summary of experiments showing that preincubation of slices with the protein synthesis inhibitor anisomycin (20 μm; 60 min) permitted persistent LFS-induced depotentiation (LFS-DEP) of four trains of 100 Hz LTP (n = 8; •) but had no effect on the induction of LTP (n = 8; ○). B, summary of experiments showing that preincubation of slices with another protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide (60 μm; 30–60 min), also permitted persistent LFS-DEP of four trains of 100 Hz LTP (n = 7; •) but had no effect on the induction of LTP (n = 8; ○). C, summary of experiments showing that preincubation of slices with transcriptional inhibitor, actinomycin-D (25 μm; 30–60 min), did not affect the induction of either the synaptic resistance to LFS-DEP (n = 6; •) or LTP (n = 8; ○). D, summary histogram comparing the effects of different concentrations of anisomycin on the induction of four trains of 100 Hz LTP (filled columns) and LFS-DEP (open columns). E, summary histogram comparing the effects of different concentrations of cycloheximide on the induction of four trains of 100 Hz LTP (filled columns) and LFS-DEP (open columns). F, summary histogram comparing the effects of different concentrations of actinomycin-D on the induction of four trains of 100 Hz LTP (filled columns) and LFS-DEP (open columns). The magnitude of LTP was calculated at 50 min after HFS and the magnitude of LFS-DEP was calculated at 40 min after the end of LFS. In DF the numbers in parentheses indicate the number of slices tested. Asterisks represent a significant difference compared with slices not receiving LFS.