Table 3.
Mean sagittal plan displacements (mm) in region of interest
rat ID | Rostral–caudal | s.e.m. | Ventral–dorsal | s.e.m. |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.82 | 0.02 |
2 | 0.31 | 0.08 | 0.40 | 0.05 |
3 | −0.06 | 0.02 | 0.21 | 0.03 |
4 | 0.36 | 0.08 | 0.46 | 0.02 |
5 | 0.29 | 0.10 | 0.86 | 0.02 |
6 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.81 | 0.04 |
7 | −0.33 | 0.07 | 1.54 | 0.03 |
8 | −0.53 | 0.04 | 1.24 | 0.03 |
9 | −0.69 | 0.03 | 1.24 | 0.03 |
10 | −0.78 | 0.03 | 0.78 | 0.03 |
11 | −0.27 | 0.04 | 1.36 | 0.03 |
Averages | −0.12 | 0.06 | 0.88 | 0.03 |
Mean rostral–caudal and ventral–dorsal displacements of tissues in the mid-sagittal plane. The average rostral–caudal displacement was −0.12 ± 0.06 mm compared to 1.0 mm thickness of axial slices. The average ventral–dorsal displacement was 0.88 ± 0.03 and this value was comparable to the ventral sector displacement (4.9–9.5 mm) that was from a tissue volume in the same region of interest measured in axial slices. Note that rostral–caudal displacement is orthogonal to axial images; positive (+) direction is rostral, and ventral–dorsal displacement is in same direction as ventral–dorsal in axial images; positive (+) direction is ventral.