Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan 13;563(Pt 3):925–943. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.076422

Table 2.

Group mean femoral venous blood velocity responses from protocol 2 during ribcage, diaphragm and ribcage with manual abdominal compression breathing conditions at rest and during mild calf exercise (n = 5)

graphic file with name tjp0563-0925-mu1.jpg (cm s−1) Vfv,I/Vfv,TOT (%) ΔPES,I (cmH2O) ΔPGA,I (cmH2O) MAP (mmHg)
Rest
 Ribcage 13.0 ± 4.7 115 ± 44 –7.9 ± 1.3 –2.4 ± 1.7 94 ± 3
 Diaphragm 10.2 ± 2.4 6 ± 9 –5.4 ± 1.3 5.6 ± 1.9 94 ± 3
 Ribcage + abdominal compression 9.8 ± 3.3 6 ± 21 –8.1 ± 1.2 3.2 ± 1.0* 93 ± 3
Mild calf contraction
 Ribcage 18.0 ± 2.4 69 ± 10 –8.1 ± 1.5 –1.69 ± 1.3 94 ± 5
 Diaphragm 15.3 ± 2.1 18.9 ± 1.6 –6.5 ± 1.3 6.3 ± 1.8 96 ± 4
 Ribcage + abdominal compression 17.5 ± 2.9 31.6 ± 10.4 –7.8 ± 1.7 3.55 ± 1.4 97 ± 5

graphic file with name tjp0563-0925-mu2.jpg, mean femoral venous blood velocity over the course of a breath; ∫Vfv,I/∫Vfv,TOT, integrated femoral venous blood velocity during inspiration divided by integrated blood velocity over the course of a breath; ΔPES,I inspiratory oesophageal pressure excursion; ΔPGA,I, inspiratory gastric pressure excursion.

*

Significantly different from ribcage breathing at rest, P < 0.05;

significantly different from ribcage breathing during mild calf contraction, P < 0.05.