Skip to main content
. 2004 Dec 20;563(Pt 3):689–711. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.078907

Table 4.

Comparison of mechanics and biochemistry: potential rate-limiting steps

Fibre shortening and cross-bridge dissociation
Substrate Velocity (L s−1)a NDP koff (s−1)b Predicted velocity (L s−1)c k′ (AM) (μm−1 s−1)
Mg·ATP 0.88 ± 0.04 (19) 300 ± 50 (4) 1.8 1.2 ± 0.1 (6)
Mn·ATP 0.73 ± 0.04 (6) 300 ± 50 (4) 1.8 1.2 ± 0.2 (4)
Ni·ATP 0.17 ± 0.02 (8) 150 ± 40 (4) 0.9 0.2 ± 0.05 (4)
Mg·CTP 0.51 ± 0.04 (5) > 300d > 1.8 0.14, 0.07e
Mg·ITP 0.13 (2) ? ? ?
Force recovery, ATP hydrolysis and phosphate release
Substrate kr1 (s−1)a k+hyd (s−1) Khyd kPi-off (s−1) Predicted kr1f (s−1) NTPase (s−1)
Mg·ATP 5.2 ± 0.3 (46) 7.7 ± 0.9 (8) 1.7 (8) 23h 5.2 1.9 ± 0.2 (11)
Mn·ATP 4.6 ± 0.2 (14) 8.8 ± 0.9 (8) 5.8 (8) ? ? 2.5 ± 0.2 (8)
Ni·ATP 3.2 ± 0.2 (15) > 0.6g (8) > 0.006g (8) ? ? 0.7 ± 0.2 (4)
Mg·CTP 7.8 ± 0.4 (11) 15.4h 3.3h 18h 7.8 2.2 ± 0.1 (5)
Mg·ITP 1.0 ± 0.1 (2) 0.15i ∼0.5i ? ? 0.15 ± 0.04 (5)

Values are mean ± error, where error is s.e.m. for mechanics and s.d. for biochemistry. Number of replicates (n) shown in parentheses (= fibres in mechanics experiments). NDP koff, first-order rate constant of ADP dissociation from actomyosin (n indicates replicates at each [ATP]); k′, second-order rate constant of Me·NTP binding to actomyosin; kr1, single-exponential rate constant of force recovery; k+hyd and Khyd, forward rate and equilibrium constants, respectively, of the NTP hydrolysis step of myosin S1. NTPase, steady-state NTPase activity of cross-linked acto-S1.

a

For Mg·ATP, shortening velocity and kr1 are taken from Table 2. The mean ± s.e.m. for the alternative substrates was obtained by multiplying the Mg·ATP values by the relative effects given in Table 3. L s−1, fibre lengths per second.

b

Equilibrium constant for ADP binding to actomyosin = 0.13 mm for Mg·ATP. n number of traces at each [ATP].

c

Lengths per second calculated assuming 5 nm working stroke estimated from shortening velocity at low [ATP] (White et al. 1993).

d

Rate of CDP release reported by Robinson et al. (1993) was higher than for ADP release (taken from this study).

e

White et al. (1993) using actomyosin-S1 and Regnier et al. (1998) using acto-heavy meromyosin (acto-HMM), respectively; 10°C.

f

Predicted kr1 is from single-exponential functions fitted to simulated force records obtained from the kinetic scheme presented in Discussion, where hydrolysis is step 2 and Pi release is step 4. For Mg·ATP, the rate constants are given there and above, with K3= 0.5. For Mg·CTP, K3= 1, and in addition to the rates given above, k1= 240 s−1(White et al. 1993) and k5= 0.7 s−1 (taken from fibre CTPase; Pate et al. 1993). k1 and k5 have been corrected for temperature.

g

k+hyd for Ni·ATP is a lower estimate as the maximum rate was not reached within the accessible [S1].

h

White et al. (1997). Khyd is that reported for S1 at 10°C; k+hyd has been extrapolated from 10 to 5°C using a Q10 of 5 and correcting for ionic strength. The Pi release rate for CTP assumes that the ratio of rates using CTP and ATP is the same at 20°C (their study) and 5°C.

i

k+hyd for ITP was estimated from Khyd and steady-state ITPase activity at 20°C, where the hydrolysis step is rate limiting. k+hyd and Khyd have been corrected for temperature and ionic strength.