Table I.
Survival rates of transgenic plants under different stress conditions
| CBF4-Overexpressing Lines | Survivala | Totalb | Survivalc |
|---|---|---|---|
| % | |||
| Freezing tolerance (nonacclimated)d | |||
| Control | 1 | 169 | 1 |
| L10 | 44 | 85 | 52 |
| L48 | 29 | 35 | 83 |
| L2 | 44 | 44 | 100 |
| Freezing tolerance (cold acclimated)e | |||
| Control | 4 | 220 | 2 |
| L10 | 50 | 91 | 55 |
| L48 | 15 | 28 | 54 |
| L2 | 73 | 82 | 89 |
| Drought tolerancef | |||
| Control | 3 | 181 | 2 |
| L10 | 44 | 98 | 45 |
| L48 | 123 | 141 | 87 |
No. of survival plants.
Total no. of plants used in each assay.
Percentage of survival plants.
Two-week-old plants grown on petri dishes at 22°C and then frozen at −10°C for 20 h.
Two-week-old plants grown on petri dishes at 22°C, transferred to 4°C for 4 d, and then frozen at −15°C for 20 h.
Two-week-old soil-grown plants withheld water for 9 d, rewatered, and scored 4 d later. Plants were considered dead if all the leaves were brown and there was no regrowth 4 d after rewatering. Water loss during the drought period was similar for all pots independent of the plant size (data not shown).