Abstract
1 Dose-ratios and potency ratios, obtained with the guinea-pig isolated ileum by calculating matching concentrations from a least-squares fit using a logistic relationship between response and dose, differ from those obtained with the more usual assumption that response is a linear function of log dose over a limited range. 2 The differences are not due to the mathematical treatment of the results but arise from changes in sensitivity associated with the production of very high or very low responses. 3 With this preparation there is no advantage in avoiding the linear transformation and fitting the results to the complete dose-response curve though this might not apply to results obtained from other tissues with less variable sensitivity.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Abramson F. B., Barlow R. B., Franks F. M., Pearson J. D. Relationships between chemical structure and affinity for postganglionic acetylcholine receptors of the guinea-pig ileum. Br J Pharmacol. 1974 May;51(1):81–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1974.tb09635.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abramson F. B., Barlow R. B., Mustafa M. G., Stephenson R. P. Relationships between chemical structure and affinity for acetylcholine receptors. Br J Pharmacol. 1969 Sep;37(1):207–233. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1969.tb09539.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barlow R. B., Scott N. C., Stephenson R. P. The affinity and efficacy of onium salts on the frog rectus abdominis. Br J Pharmacol Chemother. 1967 Sep;31(1):188–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1967.tb01989.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker R. B., Waud D. R. Pharmacological estimation of drug-receptor dissociation constants. Statistical evaluation. I. Agonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1971 Apr;177(1):1–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waud D. R., Parker R. B. Pharmacological estimation of drug-receptor dissociation constants. Statistical evaluation. II. Competitive antagonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1971 Apr;177(1):13–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]