Skip to main content
. 2002 Nov;130(3):1109–1120. doi: 10.1104/pp.005595

Table II.

Expression profile of several HL-induced genes under different environmental conditions

Experiment Gene
Putative sHSP HSC70-G7 APX1 ELIP GST1 GST6 CHS HY5 Blue Cu2+ protein Hypothetical protein Unknown Unknown
HL plants (1,000 μmol m−2 s−1) 10.4 5.6 2.7 5.0 3.6 8.6 2.2 3.0 2.6
IR-filtered HL plants (1,000 μmol m−2 s−1) 2.5 4.2 2.9 2.9 2.4 2.6 2.4 3.4 3.0 2.6 3.8
SMD experiment and identification no.
 Cells + H2O2 (9,371 and 7,525) 11.7 3.6 2.4 2.5 3.4
 Antimycin A treatment (5,198 and 5,201) 3.5 −2 4.1
 Chlorotic (cch1) leaves (11,604 and 11,605) 2.3 2.4 3.1 2.1 2.2
 Circadian rhythm (2,368 and 10,186) −10 8.3
 Aluminum stress 1 (7,304 and 7,305) 2.6
 Shade avoidance 3 (8,266 and 8,130) −5 −5 −3
 Continuous light (4,188)
 Pathogen response (9,754 and 9,753) 2.0
 Iron deficiency (9,549 and 7,114) 4.6
 Vernalization 2 (5,247 and 5,248) 2.6
 ABA-insensitive mutant (11,757 and 11,895) 3.5 2.1 9.1 8.6 7.2 −2
 Leaves-etiolated seedlings (3,610) −2.5 −5 −3 −2.5
 Chilling tolerance (14,448 and 14,449) −2.5 3.6 2.8 3.2 3.2

Expression ratio of HL-induced genes representing functional groups compared with their expression level under a range of different environmental or genetic experiments from SMD (http://genome_www4.stanford.edu/MicroArray/SMD/). The SMD identification no. is indicated in parentheses. Data are the average of two experiments where possible and values less than 2-fold are considered as unchanged (–).