TABLE 3.
Comparison of levels of reduction for three rec10 mutants
| Fold reduction in recombination frequencya
|
||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intergenic
|
Intragenic: | |||||||
| rec10 allele | LinE status | pro1–ura1 | pro2–arg3 | his4–lys4 | ade8–arg4 | ade6–tps16 | ade6–arg1 | ura1 |
| rec10-109b | Partial | 1.0 | 1.6 | 0.8 | NA | 14.6 | NA | 0.7 |
| rec10-155c | None | 2.1 | 4.7 | 3.4 | 6.2 | 5.6 | NA | 6.1 |
| rec10-175d | None | 42.0 | NA | 64.0 | NA | NA | >96.0 | 70.7 |
a
Relative to rec10+: These reductions are derived from relative reductions in recombination frequency and not genetic distances (in the case of this study the recombination frequencies were the same values employed to calculate genetic distances; see Figure 1).
b
Derived from De Veaux and Smith (1994).
c
Derived from this study.
d
Derived from this study and Ellermeier and Smith (2005).