Abstract
OBJECTIVE--To examine whether audit can be done cost effectively by a practice's receptionist. DESIGN--The practice set goals for various aspects of care, and forms were devised for the receptionist to collect, analyse, and present data to assess whether these goals had been achieved in the previous year. SETTING--Six doctor practice in south London looking after 11,500 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Ability of receptionist to present data showing the level of attainment of the practice's goals; time spent on audit by receptionist each week. RESULTS--The practice set goals for immunisation; follow up of patients with abnormal cervical smears; frequency of recording of blood pressure and smoking habit; screening of patients over 75; care of diabetic patients and patients with serious mental illness; antenatal care; variations in workload; and availability of appointments. The receptionist was able to audit all these tasks in four hours a week; this increased her job satisfaction and extended her skills. A small amount of regular supervision was necessary--roughly 30 minutes a week in the first year of the study and 30 minutes a fortnight in the second--to ensure accuracy and deal with any difficulties that arose. CONCLUSION--The method developed enabled a receptionist to audit aspects of the practice cost effectively. There is great scope for enlarging the conventional role of the receptionist.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bosanquet N. Quality of care in general practice--lessons from the past. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Mar;39(320):88–90. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buckley E. G. Quality assessment or quality control? J R Coll Gen Pract. 1989 Aug;39(325):309–311. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Difford F. Defining essential data for audit in general practice. BMJ. 1990 Jan 13;300(6717):92–94. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6717.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3 Suppl):166–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shaw C. D., Costain D. W. Guidelines for medical audit: seven principles. BMJ. 1989 Aug 19;299(6697):498–499. doi: 10.1136/bmj.299.6697.498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith T. Medical audit. BMJ. 1990 Jan 13;300(6717):65–65. doi: 10.1136/bmj.300.6717.65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]