Skip to main content
. 2003 May;132(1):174–184. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.016857

Table II.

Assessment of wild-type and independent resistant lines after herbicide application and segregation of chlorsulfuron resistance in T1 progeny

Line Response on Application of 84 μm Chlorsulfuron
T1 Progeny Seedlings No. of Plants
Plant phenotype Leaf color Presence of necroses Fresh weighta Resistant Sensitive
g
WT (Pro-196 and Trp-573) Sensitive Bleached +++ 197.02 ± 8.36 a   0 330
rchl-3.11 (Leu-196) Susceptible Green + 214.6 ± 12.87 a 149 61
χ2  = 1.835
rchl-20b (Thr-196) Resistant Green 316.25 ± 9.27 c 400 0
rchl-17 (Ala-196) Resistant Green 262.02 ± 5.31 b 113 37
χ2  = 0.009
rchl-5.5 (Ser-196) Resistant Green 254.12 ± 6.23 b 167 53
χ2  = 0.097
rchl-6.6 (Leu-573) Resistant Green 242.17 ± 15.92 b 184 68
χ2  = 0.529
rchl-2.5 (Leu-573) Resistant Green 237.02 ± 14.01 b 175 65
χ2  = 0.556
a

Values presented as a mean ± se from measurements of five independent plants. Within-column means without common letters are significantly different at P < 0.05. 

b

Resistant dihaploid line. +, Indicates that some leaves had small necrotic spots; +++, indicates wide necroses up to dryness of the whole leaf blade. χ2 values were calculated on the basis of expected ratio of three resistant to one sensitive plant.