. 2005 Mar 1;7(1):70.

Table 2.

Hierarchical Logistic Regression Results^*

Model and Independent variables^**	B	S.E.	Significance	Odds Ratio	95% CI
Submodel 1: Perceived HIV Risk
Age	.2359	.1747	.1767	1.27	0.90, 1.78
*Marital status*	*−.4864*	*.1907*	*.0108*	*0.61*	*0.42, 0.89*
Sex	.0649	.1533	.6719	1.07	0.79, 1.44
HIV education	−.1975	.1754	.2601	0.82	0.58, 1.16
*HIV awareness*	*.3763*	*.1498*	*.0120*	*1.46*	*1.09, 1.95*
Submodel 2: HIV Testing
*Age*	*−1.1357*	*.1865*	*.0000*	*0.32*	*0.22, 0.46*
*Marital Status*	*.4104*	*.1902*	*.0310*	*1.51*	*1.04, 2.19*
Sex	−.1274	.1673	.4463	0.88	0.63, 1.22
*HIV education*	*.4252*	*.1827*	*.0199*	*1.53*	*1.07, 2.19*
*HIV awareness*	*.3310*	*.1589*	*.0372*	*1.39*	*1.02, 1.90*
Perceived HIV risk	.2224	.1571	.1569	1.25	0.92, 1.70
Submodel 3a: Consistent Condom Use With Last Steady Partner
Age	.1445	.2461	.5572	1.56	0.71, 1.87
*Marital status*	*−1.0798*	*.2859*	*.0002*	*0.34*	*0.19, 0.59*
Sex	.0936	.2125	.6596	1.10	0.72, 1.67
HIV education	.1573	.2525	.5332	1.17	0.71, 1.92
HIV awareness	.2409	.2136	.2595	1.27	0.84, 1.93
*Perceived HIV risk*	*−.6471*	*.2104*	*.0021*	*0.52*	*0.35, 0.79*
HIV testing	−.0660	.2214	.7657	0.94	0.62, 1.44
Submodel 3b: Consistent Condom Use With Last Nonsteady Partner
Age	.1180	.4039	.7701	1.13	0.51, 2.48
*Marital status*	*−1.2633*	*.5584*	*.0237*	*0.28*	*0.09, 0.84*
Sex	.5292	.3365	.1159	1.70	0.88, 3.28
HIV education	.1713	.4439	.6996	1.19	0.50, 2.83
HIV awareness	.1095	.3490	.7538	1.12	0.56, 2.21
Perceived HIV risk	−.3827	.3351	.2535	0.68	0.35, 1.32
HIV testing	.3626	.3744	.3328	1.44	0.69, 2.99
Submodel 3c: Multiple Sex Partners
*Age*	*.4439*	*.2141*	*.0381*	*1.56*	*1.02, 2.37*
*Marital status*	*−1.1461*	*.2645*	*.0000*	*0.32*	*0.19, 0.53*
*Sex*	*1.2606*	*.1785*	*.0000*	*3.53*	*2.49, 5.01*
HIV education	−.3969	.2225	.0744	0.67	0.43, 1.04
HIV awareness	.2753	.1844	.1355	1.32	0.92, 1.90
*Perceived HIV risk*	*.5718*	*.1750*	*.0011*	*1.77*	*1.26, 2.50*
HIV testing	.3148	.1952	.1068	1.37	0.93, 2.01