Skip to main content
. 2006 Jan 31;2:2006.0004. doi: 10.1038/msb4100046

Table 2.

Network properties for selected metabolic reconstructions

Organism Reconstruction reference Linksa (irr/rev) Metsb APL D k SC Network structure subsets
                GSC S P IS
M. barkeri This study 636/253 592 8.00 24 3.03 7 322 54 131 85
E. coli Reed et al (2003) 1076/333 725 6.75 19 3.89 8 468 145 65 47
S. cerevisiae Duarte et al (2004) 1073/536 972 8.00 31 3.36 11 629 98 125 120
                       
E. coli Ma and Zeng (2003) NR 811 8.20 23 NR 29 274 93 161 283
S. cerevisiae Ma and Zeng (2003) NR 679 9.71 NR NR NR 206 54 164 255
NR, not reported; irr, irreversible; rev, reversible; Mets, metabolites; APL, average path length—average over the shortest paths between all metabolites; D, network diameter—shortest path length between the most distant metabolites in a network; 〈k〉, average degree—average number of links per metabolite; SC, strong components—fully connected subnetworks; GSC, giant strong component—the largest strong component; S, substrate subset—metabolites that can be converted to metabolites in the GSC; P, product subset—metabolites that can be produced from metabolites in the GSC; IS, isolated subset—metabolites that can not be converted to or produced from metabolites in the GSC.
The network properties for the metabolic reconstructions generated by Reed et al (2003), Duarte et al (2004), and those of the M. barkeri model were calculated in this study. These models were built specifically for use with constraint-based methods. The additional network properties were reported for reconstructions generated by Ma and Zeng (2003).

aModel compartmentalization was conserved (Duarte et al, 2004).

bCurrency metabolites were removed from each network.