Table 2.
Organism | Reconstruction reference | Linksa (irr/rev) | Metsb | APL | D | 〈k〉 | SC | Network structure subsets | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSC | S | P | IS | ||||||||
M. barkeri | This study | 636/253 | 592 | 8.00 | 24 | 3.03 | 7 | 322 | 54 | 131 | 85 |
E. coli | Reed et al (2003) | 1076/333 | 725 | 6.75 | 19 | 3.89 | 8 | 468 | 145 | 65 | 47 |
S. cerevisiae | Duarte et al (2004) | 1073/536 | 972 | 8.00 | 31 | 3.36 | 11 | 629 | 98 | 125 | 120 |
E. coli | Ma and Zeng (2003) | NR | 811 | 8.20 | 23 | NR | 29 | 274 | 93 | 161 | 283 |
S. cerevisiae | Ma and Zeng (2003) | NR | 679 | 9.71 | NR | NR | NR | 206 | 54 | 164 | 255 |
NR, not reported; irr, irreversible; rev, reversible; Mets, metabolites; APL, average path length—average over the shortest paths between all metabolites; D, network diameter—shortest path length between the most distant metabolites in a network; 〈k〉, average degree—average number of links per metabolite; SC, strong components—fully connected subnetworks; GSC, giant strong component—the largest strong component; S, substrate subset—metabolites that can be converted to metabolites in the GSC; P, product subset—metabolites that can be produced from metabolites in the GSC; IS, isolated subset—metabolites that can not be converted to or produced from metabolites in the GSC. | |||||||||||
The network properties for the metabolic reconstructions generated by Reed et al (2003), Duarte et al (2004), and those of the M. barkeri model were calculated in this study. These models were built specifically for use with constraint-based methods. The additional network properties were reported for reconstructions generated by Ma and Zeng (2003). |
aModel compartmentalization was conserved (Duarte et al, 2004).
bCurrency metabolites were removed from each network.