Table.
Study | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | # of Cases |
---|---|---|---|---|
Raut et al[7] | 91% | 100% | 92% | 233 |
Eloubeidi et al[8] | 84% | 97% | 84% | 158 |
Harewood et al[9] | 94% | 71% | 92% | 185 |
Ylgan et al[10] | 78% | 100% | NR | 80 |
Chang et al[11] | 92% | 100% | 95% | 44 |
Bhutani et al[12] | 64% | 100% | NR | 47 |
Williams et al[13] | 82% | 100% | 85% | 144 |
Binmoeller et al[14] | 76% | 100% | NR | 40 |
Gress et al[15] | 80% | 100% | 85% | 121 |
Voss et al[16] | 75% | 88% | 74% | 73 |
Fritscher-Ravens et al[17] | 84% | 100% | 92% | 78 |
Afify et al[18] | 80% | 89% | NR | 69 |
NR = Not reported