Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Dec 22;266(1437):2491–2497. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0951

Joint effects of feeding and breeding behaviour on trophic dimorphism in hummingbirds

R Bleiweiss 1
PMCID: PMC1690480  PMID: 10693820

Abstract

A survey of 166 hummingbird species reveals novel associations of bill-length sexual dimorphism (BLSD) with plumage and breeding behaviours. Across all species, female bills become proportionately longer than male bills (higher female-to-male BLSD ratio) as sexual dichromatism increases. However, male bills are proportionately longer (lower female-to-male BLSD ratio) in both lekkers (traditional group display) and clustered breeders (female harems or colonial nests) compared with dispersed breeders. The overall positive association of plumage with BLSD suggests that social status determines priority of access to nectar-providing flowers. Furthermore, the distinctive BLSD associated with breeding aggregations may arise from behaviours that impose constraints on the usual male priority at flowers: female dominance over males around nest colonies and male residence on lek-mating territories. These various factors appear to alter plumage and bill characters of both sexes to produce the range of dimorphisms within the various dispersed and aggregated breeding system categories. Feedback loops caused by ecological consequences of breeding behaviour may alter the evolutionary dynamics of breeding systems, bird-plant interactions, and competing pollinators, as well as help explain the lek paradox.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (162.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bleiweiss R., Kirsch J. A., Matheus J. C. DNA hybridization evidence for the principal lineages of hummingbirds (Aves:Trochilidae). Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Mar;14(3):325–343. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215–223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Grafen A. The phylogenetic regression. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989 Dec 21;326(1233):119–157. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1989.0106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
10693820s01.pdf (34.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES