Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Mar 22;267(1443):539–543. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1034

Sex-ratio optimization with helpers at the nest.

I Pen 1, F J Weissing 1
PMCID: PMC1690579  PMID: 10787155

Abstract

In many cooperatively breeding animals, offspring produced earlier in life assist their parents in raising subsequent broods. Such helping behaviour is often confined to offspring of one sex. Sex-allocation theory predicts that parents overproduce offspring of the helping sex, but the expected degree of sex-ratio bias was thought to depend on specific details of female and male life histories, hampering empirical tests of the theory. Here we demonstrate the following two theories. (i) If all parents produce the same sex ratio, the evolutionarily stable sex ratio obeys a very simple rule that is valid for a general class of life histories. The rule predicts that the expected sex-ratio bias depends on the product of only two parameters which are relatively easily measured: the average number of helping offspring per nest and the relative contribution to offspring production per helper. (ii) If the benefit of helping varies between parents, and parents facultatively adjust the sex ratio accordingly, then the population sex ratio is not necessarily biased towards the helping sex. For example, in line with empirical evidence, if helpers are produced under favourable conditions and parents do not adjust their clutch size to the number of helpers, then a surplus of the non-helping sex is expected.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (165.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Charnov E. L. Trade-off-invariant rules for evolutionarily stable life histories. Nature. 1997 May 22;387(6631):393–394. doi: 10.1038/387393a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark A. B. Sex ratio and local resource competition in a prosimian primate. Science. 1978 Jul 14;201(4351):163–165. doi: 10.1126/science.201.4351.163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Frank S. A., Swingland I. R. Sex ratio under conditional sex expression. J Theor Biol. 1988 Dec 7;135(3):415–418. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(88)80256-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Niemann T. H., Lucas J. G., Marsh W. L., Jr To freeze or not to freeze. A comparison of methods for the handling of breast biopsies with no palpable abnormality. Am J Clin Pathol. 1996 Aug;106(2):225–228. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/106.2.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Taylor P. D. Inclusive fitness arguments in genetic models of behaviour. J Math Biol. 1996;34(5-6):654–674. doi: 10.1007/BF02409753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES