Abstract
Data on species richness and taxon age are assembled for the extant hexapod orders (insects and their six-legged relatives). Coupled with estimates of phylogenetic relatedness, and simple statistical null models, these data are used to locate where, on the hexapod tree, significant changes in the rate of cladogenesis (speciation-minus-extinction rate) have occurred. Significant differences are found between many successive pairs of sister taxa near the base of the hexapod tree, all of which are attributable to a shift in diversification rate after the origin of the Neoptera (insects with wing flexion) and before the origin of the Holometabola (insects with complete metamorphosis). No other shifts are identifiable amongst supraordinal taxa. Whilst the Coleoptera have probably diversified faster than either of their putative sister lineages, they do not stand out relative to other closely related clades. These results suggest that any Creator had a fondness for a much more inclusive clade than the Coleoptera, definitely as large as the Eumetabola (Holometabola plus bugs and their relatives), and possibly as large as the entire Neoptera. Simultaneous, hence probable causative events are discussed, of which the origin of wing flexion has been the focus of much attention.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (98.2 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Blaxter M. Evolutionary biology. Sum of the arthropod parts. Nature. 2001 Sep 13;413(6852):121–122. doi: 10.1038/35093191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burmester T., Massey H. C., Jr, Zakharkin S. O., Benes H. The evolution of hexamerins and the phylogeny of insects. J Mol Evol. 1998 Jul;47(1):93–108. doi: 10.1007/pl00006366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farrell BD. "Inordinate Fondness" explained: why are there So many beetles? . Science. 1998 Jul 24;281(5376):555–559. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5376.555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nee S. Inferring speciation rates from phylogenies. Evolution. 2001 Apr;55(4):661–668. doi: 10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0661:isrfp]2.0.co;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nee S., May R. M., Harvey P. H. The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 May 28;344(1309):305–311. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Purvis A., Nee S., Harvey P. H. Macroevolutionary inferences from primate phylogeny. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 22;260(1359):329–333. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sanderson M. J., Donoghue M. J. Shifts in diversification rate with the origin of angiosperms. Science. 1994 Jun 10;264(5165):1590–1593. doi: 10.1126/science.264.5165.1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]