TABLE 1.
Station | Mean separationb (log CFU/100 ml) | nc |
---|---|---|
14 | 2.14* | 38 |
8 | 2.39† | 36 |
9 | 2.61‡ | 32 |
13 | 2.74‡,§ | 53 |
12 | 2.75‡,§ | 53 |
11 | 2.88‡,§ | 52 |
10 | 2.86§ | 59 |
5 | 2.96§ | 52 |
6 | 2.91§ | 52 |
7 | 3.02§ | 52 |
3 | 2.92§ | 52 |
2 | 2.93§ | 52 |
1 | 3.02§ | 58 |
4 | 2.96§ | 59 |
Weekly water samples were taken from 14 sites along Dunes Creek from June to November 1999 and from February to November 2000 (see Fig. 2 for locations of stations). One-way analysis of variance showed that the stations were significantly different in mean E. coli density (F13, 686 = 13.8, P = 0.001).
Values with different symbols are significantly different (P ≤ 0.05).
n, number of samples.