Abstract
Symmetrical human faces are attractive. Two explanations have been proposed to account for symmetry preferences: (i) the evolutionary advantage view, which posits that symmetry advertises mate quality and (ii) the perceptual bias view, which posits that symmetry preferences are a consequence of greater ease of processing symmetrical images in the visual system. Here, we show that symmetry preferences are greater when face images are upright than when inverted. This is evidence against a simple perceptual bias view, which suggests symmetry preference should be constant across orientation about a vertical axis. We also show that symmetry is preferred even in familiar faces, a finding that is unexpected by perceptual bias views positing that symmetry is only attractive because it represents a familiar prototype of that particular class of stimuli.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (132.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ATTNEAVE F. Symmetry, information, and memory for patterns. Am J Psychol. 1955 Jun;68(2):209–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Enquist M., Arak A. Symmetry, beauty and evolution. Nature. 1994 Nov 10;372(6502):169–172. doi: 10.1038/372169a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Enquist M., Ghirlanda S. Evolutionary biology. The secrets of faces. Nature. 1998 Aug 27;394(6696):826–827. doi: 10.1038/29636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grammer K., Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol. 1994 Sep;108(3):233–242. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Halberstadt J., Rhodes G. The attractiveness of nonface averages: implications for an evolutionary explanation of the attractiveness of average faces. Psychol Sci. 2000 Jul;11(4):285–289. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herbert A. M., Humphrey G. K. Bilateral symmetry detection: testing a 'callosal' hypothesis. Perception. 1996;25(4):463–480. doi: 10.1068/p250463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lampel A. K., Anderson N. H. Combining visual and verbal information in an impression-formation task. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1968 May;9(1):1–6. doi: 10.1037/h0025716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Little A. C., Burt D. M., Penton-Voak I. S., Perrett D. I. Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 7;268(1462):39–44. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Little Anthony C., Hancock Peter J. B. The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. Br J Psychol. 2002 Nov;93(Pt 4):451–464. doi: 10.1348/000712602761381349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mealey L., Bridgstock R., Townsend G. C. Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jan;76(1):151–158. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.1.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray J. E., Yong E., Rhodes G. Revisiting the perception of upside-down faces. Psychol Sci. 2000 Nov;11(6):492–496. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Penton-Voak I. S., Jones B. C., Little A. C., Baker S., Tiddeman B., Burt D. M., Perrett D. I. Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Aug 7;268(1476):1617–1623. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rhodes G., Yoshikawa S., Clark A., Lee K., McKay R., Akamatsu S. Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: in search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception. 2001;30(5):611–625. doi: 10.1068/p3123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rhodes G., Zebrowitz L. A., Clark A., Kalick S. M., Hightower A., McKay R. Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health? Evol Hum Behav. 2001 Jan;22(1):31–46. doi: 10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00060-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rock I. The perception of disoriented figures. Sci Am. 1974 Jan;230(1):78–85. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0174-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scheib J. E., Gangestad S. W., Thornhill R. Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Sep 22;266(1431):1913–1917. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swaddle J. P., Cuthill I. C. Asymmetry and human facial attractiveness: symmetry may not always be beautiful. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jul 22;261(1360):111–116. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thornhill R, Gangestad SW. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Dec;3(12):452–460. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01403-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]