Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Dec 22;270(1533):2591–2598. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2532

Competition and predation in simple food webs: intermediately strong trade-offs maximize coexistence.

Reinier HilleRisLambers 1, Ulf Dieckmann 1
PMCID: PMC1691548  PMID: 14728782

Abstract

Competition and predation are fundamental interactions structuring food webs. However, rather than always following these neat theoretical categories, mixed interactions are ubiquitous in nature. Of particular importance are omnivorous species, such as intra-guild predators that can both compete with and predate on their prey. Here, we examine trade-offs between competitive and predatory capacities by analysing the entire continuum of food web configurations existing between purely predator-prey and purely competitive interactions of two consumers subsisting on a single resource. Our results show that the range of conditions allowing for coexistence of the consumers is maximized at intermediately strong trade-offs. Even though coexistence under weak trade-offs and under very strong trade-offs is also possible, it occurs under much more restrictive conditions. We explain these findings by an intricate interplay between energy acquisition and interaction strength.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (472.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Diehl S, Feißel M. Effects of Enrichment on Three-Level Food Chains with Omnivory. Am Nat. 2000 Feb;155(2):200–218. doi: 10.1086/303319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gardner M. R., Ashby W. R. Connectance of large dynamic (cybernetic) systems: critical values for stability. Nature. 1970 Nov 21;228(5273):784–784. doi: 10.1038/228784a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Krivan V. Optimal intraguild foraging and population stability. Theor Popul Biol. 2000 Sep;58(2):79–94. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2000.1480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. McCann K. S. The diversity-stability debate. Nature. 2000 May 11;405(6783):228–233. doi: 10.1038/35012234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Neutel Anje-Margriet, Heesterbeek Johan A. P., De Ruiter Peter C. Stability in real food webs: weak links in long loops. Science. 2002 May 10;296(5570):1120–1123. doi: 10.1126/science.1068326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rosenzweig M. L. Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time. Science. 1971 Jan 29;171(3969):385–387. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3969.385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES