Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Jan 7;271(1534):15–20. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2545

Avoidance of obstacles in the absence of visual awareness.

R D McIntosh 1, K I McClements 1, I Schindler 1, T P Cassidy 1, D Birchall 1, A D Milner 1
PMCID: PMC1691557  PMID: 15002766

Abstract

The spatial character of our reaching movements is extremely sensitive to potential obstacles in the workspace. We recently found that this sensitivity was retained by most patients with left visual neglect when reaching between two objects, despite the fact that they tended to ignore the leftward object when asked to bisect the space between them. This raises the possibility that obstacle avoidance does not require a conscious awareness of the obstacle avoided. We have now tested this hypothesis in a patient with visual extinction following right temporoparietal damage. Extinction is an attentional disorder in which patients fail to report stimuli on the side of space opposite a brain lesion under conditions of bilateral stimulation. Our patient avoided obstacles during reaching, to exactly the same degree, regardless of whether he was able to report their presence. This implicit processing of object location, which may depend on spared superior parietal-lobe pathways, demonstrates that conscious awareness is not necessary for normal obstacle avoidance.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.4 MB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bisley James W., Goldberg Michael E. Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention. Science. 2003 Jan 3;299(5603):81–86. doi: 10.1126/science.1077395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caminiti R., Ferraina S., Mayer A. B. Visuomotor transformations: early cortical mechanisms of reaching. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998 Dec;8(6):753–761. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(98)80118-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chieffi S., Gentilucci M., Allport A., Sasso E., Rizzolatti G. Study of selective reaching and grasping in a patient with unilateral parietal lesion. Dissociated effects of residual spatial neglect. Brain. 1993 Oct;116(Pt 5):1119–1137. doi: 10.1093/brain/116.5.1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Connolly Jason D., Andersen Richard A., Goodale Melvyn A. FMRI evidence for a 'parietal reach region' in the human brain. Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep 4;153(2):140–145. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1587-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Culham J. C., Kanwisher N. G. Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001 Apr;11(2):157–163. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(00)00191-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Driver J., Vuilleumier P. Perceptual awareness and its loss in unilateral neglect and extinction. Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):39–88. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00124-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodale M. A., Milner A. D., Jakobson L. S., Carey D. P. A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them. Nature. 1991 Jan 10;349(6305):154–156. doi: 10.1038/349154a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Jeannerod M., Decety J., Michel F. Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion. Neuropsychologia. 1994 Apr;32(4):369–380. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90084-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Karnath Hans-Otto, Himmelbach Marc, Küker Wilhelm. The cortical substrate of visual extinction. Neuroreport. 2003 Mar 3;14(3):437–442. doi: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000059778.23521.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Milner A. D., Perrett D. I., Johnston R. S., Benson P. J., Jordan T. R., Heeley D. W., Bettucci D., Mortara F., Mutani R., Terazzi E. Perception and action in 'visual form agnosia'. Brain. 1991 Feb;114(Pt 1B):405–428. doi: 10.1093/brain/114.1.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Perenin M. T., Rossetti Y. Grasping without form discrimination in a hemianopic field. Neuroreport. 1996 Feb 29;7(3):793–797. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199602290-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Perenin M. T., Vighetto A. Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. Brain. 1988 Jun;111(Pt 3):643–674. doi: 10.1093/brain/111.3.643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Riddoch M. Jane, Humphreys Glyn W., Edwards Sarah, Baker Tracy, Willson Katherine. Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection. Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jan;6(1):82–89. doi: 10.1038/nn984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tresilian J. R. Attention in action or obstruction of movement? A kinematic analysis of avoidance behavior in prehension. Exp Brain Res. 1998 Jun;120(3):352–368. doi: 10.1007/s002210050409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vallar G., Rusconi M. L., Bignamini L., Geminiani G., Perani D. Anatomical correlates of visual and tactile extinction in humans: a clinical CT scan study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994 Apr;57(4):464–470. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.57.4.464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Vuilleumier P., Rafal R. "Both" means more than "two": localizing and counting in patients with visuospatial neglect. Nat Neurosci. 1999 Sep;2(9):783–784. doi: 10.1038/12150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weiskrantz L., Warrington E. K., Sanders M. D., Marshall J. Visual capacity in the hemianopic field following a restricted occipital ablation. Brain. 1974 Dec;97(4):709–728. doi: 10.1093/brain/97.1.709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES