Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Jan 7;271(1534):45–49. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2526

Sex-specific effects of carotenoid intake on the immunological response to allografts in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Gregory F Grether 1, Shinji Kasahara 1, Gita R Kolluru 1, Edwin L Cooper 1
PMCID: PMC1691564  PMID: 15002770

Abstract

Rarely are the evolutionary origins of mate preferences known, but, recently, the preference of female guppies (Poecilia reticulata) for males with carotenoid-based sexual coloration has been linked to a sensory bias that may have originally evolved for detecting carotenoid-rich fruits. If carotenoids enhance the immune systems of these fishes, as has been suggested for other species, this could explain the origin of the attraction to orange fruits as well as the maintenance of the female preference for orange males. We used the classic immunological technique of tissue grafting to assay a component of the immune response of guppies raised on two different dietary levels of carotenoids. Individual scales were transplanted between pairs of unrelated fishes, creating reciprocal allografts. Transplanted scales were scored on a six-point rejection scale every day for 10 days. Five days later, the same pairs of fishes received a second set of allografts and were scored again. Compared with low-carotenoid-diet males, high-carotenoid-diet males mounted a significantly stronger rejection response to the second allograft but not to the first allograft. High-carotenoid-diet females, however, showed no improvement in graft rejection compared with low-carotenoid-diet females. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental evidence for sex-specific effects of carotenoid consumption on the immune system of a species with carotenoid-based sexual coloration. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the mate preference for carotenoid coloration is maintained by the benefits to females of choosing healthy mates, but they cast doubt on the idea that the benefits of carotenoid consumption, per se, could account for the origin of the preference. The sex-specificity of carotenoid effects on allograft rejection in guppies provides indirect support for the general hypothesis that males pay an immunological cost for sexual ornamentation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (97.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altarescu G., Moore D. F., Pursley R., Campia U., Goldstein S., Bryant M., Panza J. A., Schiffmann R. Enhanced endothelium-dependent vasodilation in Fabry disease. Stroke. 2001 Jul;32(7):1559–1562. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.7.1559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blount Jonathan D., Metcalfe Neil B., Birkhead Tim R., Surai Peter F. Carotenoid modulation of immune function and sexual attractiveness in zebra finches. Science. 2003 Apr 4;300(5616):125–127. doi: 10.1126/science.1082142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COOPER E. L. THE EFFECTS OF ANTIBIOTICS AND X-IRRADIATION ON THE SURVIVAL OF SCALE HOMOGRAFTS IN FUNDULUS HETEROCLITUS. Transplantation. 1964 Jan;2:2–20. doi: 10.1097/00007890-196401000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cardwell T. N., Sheffer R. J., Hedrick P. W. MHC variation and tissue transplantation in fish. J Hered. 2001 Jul-Aug;92(4):305–308. doi: 10.1093/jhered/92.4.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Faivre Bruno, Grégoire Arnaud, Préault Marina, Cézilly Frank, Sorci Gabriele. Immune activation rapidly mirrored in a secondary sexual trait. Science. 2003 Apr 4;300(5616):103–103. doi: 10.1126/science.1081802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grether G. F. Carotenoid limitation and mate preference evolution: a test of the indicator hypothesis in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution. 2000 Oct;54(5):1712–1724. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00715.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. HILDEMANN W. H. Scale homotransplantation in goldfish (Carassius auratus). Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1957 Mar 22;64(5):775-90; discussion, 790-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1957.tb52472.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamilton W. D., Zuk M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):384–387. doi: 10.1126/science.7123238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hill GE. Is There an Immunological Cost to Carotenoid-Based Ornamental Coloration? Am Nat. 1999 Nov;154(5):589–595. doi: 10.1086/303264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jayasooriya Anura P., Weisinger Richard S., Weisinger Harrison S., Mathai Michael L., Sinclair Andrew J. Attraction to orange: sexiness, not gluttony. Science. 2002 May 3;296(5569):847–848. doi: 10.1126/science.296.5569.847b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jones S. R. The occurrence and mechanisms of innate immunity against parasites in fish. Dev Comp Immunol. 2001 Oct-Dec;25(8-9):841–852. doi: 10.1016/s0145-305x(01)00039-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Köllner B., Wasserrab B., Kotterba G., Fischer U. Evaluation of immune functions of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)--how can environmental influences be detected? Toxicol Lett. 2002 May 10;131(1-2):83–95. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(02)00044-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lindenstrom T., Buchmann K. Acquired resistance in rainbow trout against Gyrodactylus derjavini. J Helminthol. 2000 Jun;74(2):155–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rodd F. Helen, Hughes Kimberly A., Grether Gregory F., Baril Colette T. A possible non-sexual origin of mate preference: are male guppies mimicking fruit? Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 7;269(1490):475–481. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES