Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2004 Feb 7;271(1536):239–244. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2562

Digit ratio varies with sex, egg order and strength of mate preference in zebra finches.

Nancy Tyler Burley 1, Valerie Suzanne Foster 1
PMCID: PMC1691596  PMID: 15058433

Abstract

The steroid environment encountered by developing vertebrates has important organizational effects on physiology and behaviour that persist throughout an organism's lifetime. Optimal allocation of maternal steroids to zygotes may be difficult to achieve because of the sexually antagonistic effects of steroids; thus, for example, a hormone environment beneficial to a developing male may be much less beneficial to a developing female. Research into the important topic of how mothers might adaptively adjust steroid titres experienced by particular young has been constrained by the difficulty of measuring the steroid environment experienced by the embryo at critical times in development. A potential approach to this problem has been suggested by research on variation in digit ratios in humans, where the ratio of the length of the second and fourth digits reflects the steroid environment experienced by the foetus; notably, digit 4 lengthens in response to androgens. In light of the conservative nature of homeobox genes regulating early development in tetrapods, we questioned whether a sex difference in digit ratio exists in a passerine bird, the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata castanotis, and whether observed variation in the ratio is consistent with the previously reported pattern that androgen allocation to zebra finch egg yolk declines across laying order. We established an aviary population of outbred, wild-type zebra finches, and allowed them to breed freely. Hatchlings were marked to correspond to their egg order, and their digit ratios were measured after birds reached adulthood. We found that digit ratio increased across egg order, which is consistent with a pattern of decreasing androgen allocation. Moreover, digit ratios differed between the sexes. We also investigated whether variation in digit ratio among adult females predicted variation in their performance in mate-choice tests. Digit ratio accounted for almost 50% of the variance in strength of female preference for an attractive male trait: specifically, females with higher (presumably less 'androgenized') ratios had stronger preferences for attractive males. Digit ratio may prove to be an extremely useful tool for addressing a wide range of questions about vertebrate differentiation and behaviour.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (126.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnold A. P., Schlinger B. A. Sexual differentiation of brain and behavior: the zebra finch is not just a flying rat. Brain Behav Evol. 1993;42(4-5):231–241. doi: 10.1159/000114157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Birkhead I, I, Schwabl I, I, Burke I., I Testosterone and maternal effects - integrating mechanisms and function. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Mar;15(3):86–87. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01803-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Breedlove S. M., Cooke B. M., Jordan C. L. The orthodox view of brain sexual differentiation. Brain Behav Evol. 1999;54(1):8–14. doi: 10.1159/000006607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown Windy M., Finn Christopher J., Breedlove S. Marc. Sexual dimorphism in digit-length ratios of laboratory mice. Anat Rec. 2002 Jul 1;267(3):231–234. doi: 10.1002/ar.10108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burley N. Parental investment, mate choice, and mate quality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Aug;74(8):3476–3479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.8.3476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Eising C. M., Eikenaar C., Schwabl H., Groothuis T. G. Maternal androgens in black-headed gull (Larus ridibundus) eggs: consequences for chick development. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Apr 22;268(1469):839–846. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Garn S. M., Burdi A. R., Babler W. J., Stinson S. Early prenatal attainment of adult metacarpal-phalangeal rankings and proportions. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1975 Nov;43(3):327–332. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330430305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gil D., Graves J., Hazon N., Wells A. Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science. 1999 Oct 1;286(5437):126–128. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5437.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jennions M. D., Petrie M. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1997 May;72(2):283–327. doi: 10.1017/s0006323196005014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kondo T., Zákány J., Innis J. W., Duboule D. Of fingers, toes and penises. Nature. 1997 Nov 6;390(6655):29–29. doi: 10.1038/36234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Laurin I, I, Girondot I, I, de Ricqlès I Early tetrapod evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Mar;15(3):118–123. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01780-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lipar J. L., Ketterson E. D., Nolan V., Jr, Casto J. M. Egg yolk layers vary in the concentration of steroid hormones in two avian species. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1999 Aug;115(2):220–227. doi: 10.1006/gcen.1999.7296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Manning J. T., Scutt D., Wilson J., Lewis-Jones D. I. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3000–3004. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. McFadden Dennis, Shubel Erin. Relative lengths of fingers and toes in human males and females. Horm Behav. 2002 Dec;42(4):492–500. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Peichel C. L., Prabhakaran B., Vogt T. F. The mouse Ulnaless mutation deregulates posterior HoxD gene expression and alters appendicular patterning. Development. 1997 Sep;124(18):3481–3492. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.18.3481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Popescu O., Misevic G. N. Self-recognition by proteoglycans. Nature. 1997 Mar 20;386(6622):231–232. doi: 10.1038/386231b0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rice W. R. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature. 1996 May 16;381(6579):232–234. doi: 10.1038/381232a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Sockman K. W., Schwabl H. Yolk androgens reduce offspring survival. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jul 22;267(1451):1451–1456. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Trivers R. L., Willard D. E. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science. 1973 Jan 5;179(4068):90–92. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4068.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wade J. Sexual dimorphisms in avian and reptilian courtship: two systems that do not play by mammalian rules. Brain Behav Evol. 1999;54(1):15–27. doi: 10.1159/000006608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Williams T. J., Pepitone M. E., Christensen S. E., Cooke B. M., Huberman A. D., Breedlove N. J., Breedlove T. J., Jordan C. L., Breedlove S. M. Finger-length ratios and sexual orientation. Nature. 2000 Mar 30;404(6777):455–456. doi: 10.1038/35006555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. vom Saal F. S. Sexual differentiation in litter-bearing mammals: influence of sex of adjacent fetuses in utero. J Anim Sci. 1989 Jul;67(7):1824–1840. doi: 10.2527/jas1989.6771824x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES