Skip to main content

letter

. 1993 Jul 10;307(6896):123. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6896.123-b

The Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. Manufacturer fights back.

PMCID: PMC1693510 PMID: 8343710

123

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

Conroy R. M., O'Brien E., O'Malley K., Atkins N. Measurement error in the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer: what damage has been done and what can we learn? BMJ. 1993 May 15;306(6888):1319–1322. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6888.1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hense H. W., Kuulasmaa K., Zaborskis A., Kupsc W., Tuomilehto J. Quality assessment of blood pressure measurements in epidemiological surveys. The impact of last digit preference and the proportions of identical duplicate measurements. WHO Monica Project [corrected]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 1990;38(5-6):463–468. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kronmal R. A., Rutan G. H., Borhani N. O., Manolio T. A., Furberg C. D. Potential problems with random zero sphygmomanometer. Lancet. 1990 Feb 10;335(8685):360–360. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)90652-l. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
O'Brien E., Mee F., Atkins N., O'Malley K. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. Lancet. 1990 Dec 15;336(8729):1465–1468. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)93177-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

ACTIONS

RESOURCES