Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 6;34(21):e145. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl772

Table 1.

Different published helper phages

Helper phage name Mutation/mechanism aHelper phage titers/ml Display levels a,bRescued phagemid titers/ml Use in display Helper phage propagation Reference
M13K07 1011c Low 2 × 1010−12 Standard infection Growth (67)
KM13 Trypsin site in g3p, elution with trypsin 1011 Low 2 × 1010−12 Standard infection Growth (38)
g3 deletion 105−6 High ∼1010 Standard infection g3 plasmid expression under lac promoter (68)
M13MDD3.2 g3 deletion 2 × 109 NT 109 Standard infection g3p plasmid expression (33)
R408d3 g3 deletiond 1010 NT NT Standard infection g3p plasmid expression under pspA promoter (27)
Hyperphage g3 deletion (8-406) 109 High 109−10 Standard infection g3p integrated into E.coli genome (35)
CT helper phage g3 N1 & N2 domains deletede 3 × 1011 Low 1011 total 5 × 108 infective Standard infection g3p plasmid expression (37)
Ex-phage Amber stop codon 5′ g3 1012−13f High 1010−11 Non-suppressor strain Suppressor strain (36)
Phaberge Amber stop codon 3′ g3 1011 High 109−10 Non-suppressor strain Suppressor strain (34)

The mechanisms of action, as well as the reported titers of both packaged phage and helper phage are given. NT-not tested.

aTiters are unconcentrated supernatant titers—i.e. not PEG precipitated.

bRefers to the number of infectious phagemid particles, independent of whether they carry antibody or no.

cData from our laboratory.

dSome reversion due to packaging of plasmid expressing p3 observed-probably also occurs in other plasmid expression systems, but not examined.

eRescued phagemid are two populations, displaying and infective, non-displaying and non-infective.

fStandard M13K07 titers obtained in this laboratory tend to be 10–100-fold higher than obtained elsewhere.