Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
. 1993 Jan;83(1):31–36. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.31

A comparison of prenatal care use in the United States and Europe.

P Buekens 1, M Kotelchuck 1, B Blondel 1, F B Kristensen 1, J H Chen 1, G Masuy-Stroobant 1
PMCID: PMC1694498  PMID: 8417603

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. We sought to describe prenatal care use in the United States and in three European countries where accessibility to prenatal care has been reported to be better than it is in the United States. METHODS. We analyzed the 1980 US National Natality Survey, the 1981 French National Natality Survey, a 1979 sample of Danish births, and a survey performed from 1979 to 1980 in one Belgian province. RESULTS. The proportion of women who began prenatal care late (after 15 weeks) is highest in the United States (21.2%) and lowest in France (4.0%). This contrasts with the median number of visits, which is greater in the United States (11) than in Denmark (10) or in France (7). Across all maternal ages, parities, and educational levels, late initiation of prenatal care is more frequent in the United States, and median number of visits in the United States is equal to or higher than that in the other countries. CONCLUSIONS. In countries that offer nearly universal access to prenatal care, women begin care earlier during pregnancy and have fewer visits than women in the United States.

Full text

PDF
36

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blondel B., Saurel-Cubizolles M. J. An indicator of adverse pregnancy outcome in France: not receiving maternity benefits. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1991 Sep;45(3):211–215. doi: 10.1136/jech.45.3.211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blondel B., Saurel-Cubizolles M. J., Kaminski M. Impact of the French system of statutory visits on antenatal care. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1982 Sep;36(3):183–186. doi: 10.1136/jech.36.3.183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Buekens P. Variations in provision and uptake of antenatal care. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Mar;4(1):187–205. doi: 10.1016/s0950-3552(05)80219-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Forrest J. D., Singh S. Timing of prenatal care in the United States: how accurate are our measurements? Health Serv Res. 1987 Jun;22(2):235–253. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Therborn G. Migration and Western europe: the old world turning new. Science. 1987 Sep 4;237(4819):1183–1188. doi: 10.1126/science.237.4819.1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Vandenbussche P., Dujardin B., Wollast E. Perinatal geography of Belgium. Biol Neonate. 1989;55(1):34–41. doi: 10.1159/000242884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wegman M. E. Annual summary of vital statistics--1989. Pediatrics. 1990 Dec;86(6):835–847. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES