Skip to main content
American Journal of Public Health logoLink to American Journal of Public Health
letter
. 1993 Jan;83(1):115–117. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.115-a

The effect of previous cesarean sections on current cesarean rates.

A Leyland
PMCID: PMC1694517  PMID: 8417596

Full text

PDF
115

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bertollini R., DiLallo D., Spadea T., Perucci C. Cesarean section rates in Italy by hospital payment mode: an analysis based on birth certificates. Am J Public Health. 1992 Feb;82(2):257–261. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.2.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Leyland A. H., Pritchard C. W., McLoone P., Boddy F. A. Measures of performance in Scottish maternity hospitals. BMJ. 1991 Aug 17;303(6799):389–393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.303.6799.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Myers S. A., Gleicher N. 1988 U.S. cesarean-section rate: good news or bad? N Engl J Med. 1990 Jul 19;323(3):200–200. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199007193230316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Notzon F. C., Placek P. J., Taffel S. M. Comparisons of national cesarean-section rates. N Engl J Med. 1987 Feb 12;316(7):386–389. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198702123160706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Trends in caesarean section. Lancet. 1991 Jun 15;337(8755):1481–1482. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

RESOURCES