Skip to main content
. 2006 Jun 21;3(4):495–501. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nel036

Table 2.

Physicians' responses to questions regarding CAM utilization and outcomes

Question Response (%)
(1) How likely is it that you would refer a patient to a CAM practitioner (if available at Mayo Clinic Rochester) for treatment of an ailment?
    Extremely likely 16
    Somewhat likely 28
    Neither likely nor unlikely 13
    Somewhat unlikely 24
    Extremely unlikely 19
    NR 0
(2) Have you ever referred a patient to a CAM practitioner?
    Yes 24
    No 75
    NR 1
(3) With approximately what percentage of your patients do you talk about possible benefits of using CAM therapies?
    0–25 88
    26–50 7
    51–75 2
    76–100 2
    NR 1
(4) With approximately what percentage of your patients do you talk about possible harmful outcomes of using CAM therapies?
    0–25 64
    26–50 17
    51–75 11
    76–100 7
    NR 1
(5) Who usually initiates discussions of benefits and risks of a CAM therapy?
    I initiate 26
    Patient initiates 63
    Third party initiates 1
    Not applicable 9
    NR 1
(6) To what extent do you believe that the incorporation of CAM therapies into the Mayo Clinic Rochester practice would result in increased patient satisfaction?
    Major positive impact 12
    Somewhat positive impact 45
    Unsure 34
    Somewhat negative impact 6
    Very negative impact 2
    NR 1
(7) To what extent do you believe that the incorporation of CAM therapies into the Mayo Clinic Rochester practice would attract more patients?
    Major positive impact 8
    Somewhat positive impact 40
    Unsure 41
    Somewhat negative impact 8
    Very negative impact 3
    NR 0

CAM, complementary and alternative medicine; NR, no response.