Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2003 Aug 7;270(Suppl 1):S96–S99. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025

Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species.

Paul D N Hebert 1, Sujeevan Ratnasingham 1, Jeremy R deWaard 1
PMCID: PMC1698023  PMID: 12952648

Abstract

With millions of species and their life-stage transformations, the animal kingdom provides a challenging target for taxonomy. Recent work has suggested that a DNA-based identification system, founded on the mitochondrial gene, cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI), can aid the resolution of this diversity. While past work has validated the ability of COI sequences to diagnose species in certain taxonomic groups, the present study extends these analyses across the animal kingdom. The results indicate that sequence divergences at COI regularly enable the discrimination of closely allied species in all animal phyla except the Cnidaria. This success in species diagnosis reflects both the high rates of sequence change at COI in most animal groups and constraints on intraspecific mitochondrial DNA divergence arising, at least in part, through selective sweeps mediated via interactions with the nuclear genome.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (75.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avise J. C., Walker D. Species realities and numbers in sexual vertebrates: perspectives from an asexually transmitted genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 2;96(3):992–995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.3.992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ballard J. W. Comparative genomics of mitochondrial DNA in Drosophila simulans. J Mol Evol. 2000 Jul;51(1):64–75. doi: 10.1007/s002390010067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrientos A., Müller S., Dey R., Wienberg J., Moraes C. T. Cytochrome c oxidase assembly in primates is sensitive to small evolutionary variations in amino acid sequence. Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Oct;17(10):1508–1519. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blaxter Mark. Molecular systematics: Counting angels with DNA. Nature. 2003 Jan 9;421(6919):122–124. doi: 10.1038/421122a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gerber A. S., Loggins R., Kumar S., Dowling T. E. Does nonneutral evolution shape observed patterns of DNA variation in animal mitochondrial genomes? Annu Rev Genet. 2001;35:539–566. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.091106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Godfray H. Charles J. Challenges for taxonomy. Nature. 2002 May 2;417(6884):17–19. doi: 10.1038/417017a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hebert Paul D. N., Cywinska Alina, Ball Shelley L., deWaard Jeremy R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 7;270(1512):313–321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Inagaki Y., Ehara M., Watanabe K. I., Hayashi-Ishimaru Y., Ohama T. Directionally evolving genetic code: the UGA codon from stop to tryptophan in mitochondria. J Mol Evol. 1998 Oct;47(4):378–384. doi: 10.1007/pl00006395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jamieson Glyn G., France Michael, Watson David I. Results of laparoscopic antireflux operations in patients who have Barrett's esophagus. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2002 Feb;12(1):149–155. doi: 10.1016/s1052-3359(03)00071-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Johns G. C., Avise J. C. A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Nov;15(11):1481–1490. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Schmidt T. R., Wu W., Goodman M., Grossman L. I. Evolution of nuclear- and mitochondrial-encoded subunit interaction in cytochrome c oxidase. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Apr;18(4):563–569. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Shearer T. L., Van Oppen M. J. H., Romano S. L., Wörheide G. Slow mitochondrial DNA sequence evolution in the Anthozoa (Cnidaria). Mol Ecol. 2002 Dec;11(12):2475–2487. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01652.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Willett C. S., Burton R. S. Viability of cytochrome c genotypes depends on cytoplasmic backgrounds in Tigriopus californicus. Evolution. 2001 Aug;55(8):1592–1599. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00678.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu W., Schmidt T. R., Goodman M., Grossman L. I. Molecular evolution of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I in primates: is there coevolution between mitochondrial and nuclear genomes? Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2000 Nov;17(2):294–304. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES