TABLE 2.
Predicted levels of nucleotide variability and purifying selective pressure for the candidate genes of class A and three sample genes of class B
| Candidate class | ORF locus taga | Predicted product encoded by the locus | Nucleotide variation rateb | dN/dS ratio derived from best-fit model in PAML analysisc | Predicted level of purifying selectiond | Sequence data from the 15 additional Francisella strainse |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | FTL_0039 | Hypothetical membrane protein | 0.0123 | NAf | Weaker | − |
| A | FTL_0102-FTL0101 | Cl−:H+ antiporter | 0.0188 | 0.4920 | Weaker | + |
| A | FTL_0168 | Hypothetical membrane protein | 0.0044 | NA | High | − |
| A | FTL_0180 | Acyltransferase | 0.0080 | NA | Weaker | − |
| A | FTL_0391-FTL_0392 | Pilus assembly protein pilA | 0.0049 | 0.3095 | High | + |
| A | FTL_0439_ORF1 | Hypothetical protein | 0.0040 | NA | High | − |
| A | FTL_0439_ORF2 | Hypothetical protein | 0.0069 | 0.1037 | Weaker | + |
| A | FTL_0806 | Amino acid transporter family protein | 0.0056 | NA | Weaker | − |
| A | FTL_1066 | Fumaryl acetoacetate hydrolase family protein | 0.0027 | 0.0891 | High | + |
| A | FTL_1141 | 3-Oxoacyl-(acyl carrier protein) synthase III | 0.0039 | 0.3606 | High | + |
| A | FTL_1246 | Conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0331 | 0.6701 | Weaker | + |
| A | FTL_1517 | Hypothetical protein | 0.0082 | NA | Weaker | − |
| A | FTL_1521 | Chitinase family 18 protein | 0.0406 | NA | Weaker | − |
| A | FTL_1611 | Glycosyltransferase, group 2 family protein | 0.0031 | 0.1242 | High | + |
| A | FTL_1773 | Conserved hypothetical protein | 0.0040 | 0.0615 | High | + |
| A | FTL_1860 | Phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine synthase | 0.0079 | 0.0810 | Weaker | + |
| B | FTL_0997a | Hypothetical protein | NA | 0.0848 | Weaker | + |
| B | FTL_1291-FTL_1292 | Conserved hypothetical protein | NA | 1.1930 | Weaker | + |
| B | FTL_1697-FTL_1698 | Metal ion transporter | NA | 0.7753 | Weaker | + |
Locus tags from the published sequence NC_007880; when two ORFs resulted from the mutation, the locus tags for both are cited.
Based on the alignments of the ORFs from the five sequenced genomes and/or PAML analysis.
Results for all models are available in Table S2 in the supplemental material.
Inferred from the nucleotide variation rate, relative to the rate values for genes known to be under purifying selection.
+, sequences available; −, no sequence available.
NA, not available.