Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct 6;188(24):8534–8542. doi: 10.1128/JB.00846-06

TABLE 3.

Nested ANOVA testing for differences in growth rates between ancestral and evolved Δcom and wild-type clonesa

Clone type Source of variation df SSb MSc Fs
Ancestral Among genotypes 1 0.009001 0.009001 16.24152
Among lineages 8 0.004434 0.000554 0.512541
Within lineages 20 0.021625 0.001081
Total 29
Evolved Among genotypes 1 0.029142 0.029142 2.603207
Among lineages 8 0.089556 0.011195 0.050514
Within lineages 20 4.432271 0.221614
Total 29
a

F0.05[1,8] = 5.318, F0.01[1,8] = 11.259, and F0.05[8,20] = 3.564.

b

SS, sum of squares.

c

MS, mean of squares.