Skip to main content
. 2006 Oct 25;44(12):4389–4394. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01060-06

TABLE 3.

Performance of PCE EIA tested on self-taken vulvovaginal-swab specimens

Final result No. of results for PCE EIA
Positive Negative NGZa Total
Bristol laboratoryb
    True positive 52 19 3 74
    True negative 17 1,379 7 1,403
Total 69 1,398 10 1,477
Birmingham laboratoryc
    True positive 39 30 3 72
    True negative 7 1,188 5 1,200
Total 46 1,218 8 1,272
a

NGZ, negative gray zone.

b

Results including the negative-gray-zone results with nucleic acid amplification test confirmation were as follows: sensitivity, 74.3% (95% CI, 62.8 to 83.8%); specificity, 98.8% (95% CI, 98.1 to 99.3%); positive predictive value, 72.2% (95% CI, 60.4 to 82.1%); and negative predictive value, 98.1% (95% CI, 97.3 to 98.8%). Results with the negative-gray-zone results treated as negative were as follows: sensitivity, 70.2% (95% CI, 58.5 to 80.3%); specificity, 98.8% (95% CI, 98.1 to 99.3%); positive predictive value, 75.4% (95% CI, 63.5 to 84.9%); and negative predictive value, 98.4% (95% CI, 97.6 to 99%).

c

Results including the negative-gray-zone results with nucleic acid amplification test confirmation were as follows: sensitivity, 58.3% (95% CI, 46.1 to 69.8%); specificity, 99.4% (95% CI, 98.8 to 100%); positive predictive value, 85.7% (95% CI, 72.8 to 94.1%); and negative predictive value, 97.5% (95% CI, 96.5 to 98.3%). Results with the negative-gray-zone results treated as negative were as follows: sensitivity, 54.2% (95% CI, 42.0 to 66.0); specificity, 99.0 (95% CI, 98.3 to 99.5); positive predictive value, 84.8% (95% CI, 71.1 to 93.7%); and negative predictive value, 97.3% (95% CI, 96.2 to 98.1%).