Table 2. The results of the error correction method.
| Sim. no. | Errors corr. (%) | Qual. after corr. (%) | Detected DNPs (%) | False DNPs (%) | Analyzed region (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 99.30 | 99.97 | n/a | 0 (n/a) | 89 |
| 2 | 99.35 | 99.98 | n/a | 12 (100) | 96 |
| 3 | 95.01 | 99.81 | 84 | 74 (1.1) | 96 |
| 4 | 99.13 | 99.97 | n/a | 38 (100) | 95 |
| 5 | 95.55 | 99.84 | 86 | 189 (2.5) | 95 |
| 6 | 92.56 | 99.73 | 73 | 862 (2.7) | 97 |
| 7 | 93.51 | 99.76 | 75 | 320 (1.7) | 97 |
| 8 | 95.96 | 99.85 | 87 | 181 (0.8) | 97 |
| 9 | 97.17 | 99.89 | 86 | 207 (0.95) | 97 |
For each simulation, the following is reported: percentage of errors corrected, average sequence quality after error correction, percentage of DNPs detected in reads, total number of false positives (and percentage) and the percentage of region that has been analyzed.