Table 5. Results of the comparison between EULER and MisEd.
| Sim no. | False negatives/positives; Euler (%) | False negatives/positives; MisEd (%) | Errors reduced total; EULER (%) | Errors reduced total; MisEd (%) | Analyzed region; MisEd (%) | False negatives analyzed region; MisEd (%) | Errors reduced analyzed region; MisEd (%) | Errors in un-analyzed region; MisEd (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 38/1.3 | 17/0.5 | 61 | 83 | 86 | 3 | 97 | 15 |
| 11 | 37/1.4 | 16/0.5 | 62 | 83 | 85 | 2 | 97 | 14 |
| 12 | 12/1.7 | 9/0.2 | 86 | 91 | 88 | 1 | 98 | 8 |
| 13 | 12/1.5 | 10/0.1 | 87 | 90 | 88 | 2 | 98 | 8 |
| 14 (rep) | 36/5.7 | 10/4.5 | 61 | 87 | 88 | 2 | 94 | 8 |
| 15 (rep) | 11/27.9 | 7/18.4 | 69 | 79 | 89 | 3 | 82 | 5 |
Simulations 10–13 consist of non-repeated data. Simulations 14 and 15 consist of repeated data. In simulations 10, 11 and 14, a maximum error of 11% was allowed in trimming. In simulations 12, 13 and 15, a maximum error of 3% was allowed.