Table 3. Statistics measuring the difference between estimated results from distinct dye-flip pairs of carp slides after four different normalisation methods.
| Pair A–Pair B | Pair C–Pair D | Pair A–Pair C | Pair B–Pair D | Pair A–Pair D | Pair B–Pair C | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AN+RN | Range | 1.4917 | 1.2257 | 1.5175 | 1.3812 | 1.3124 | 1.4804 |
| SD | 0.0994 | 0.0891 | 0.0983 | 0.0864 | 0.0972 | 0.0942 | |
| SN+RN | Range | 1.3352 | 0.9798 | 1.4896 | 1.1591 | 1.1345 | 1.1549 |
| SD | 0.0652 | 0.0475 | 0.0783 | 0.0618 | 0.0726 | 0.0549 | |
| AN+RN+FN | Range | 1.0460 | 0.8125 | 0.8994 | 0.9876 | 0.6851 | 1.0098 |
| SD | 0.0524 | 0.0455 | 0.0534 | 0.0547 | 0.0502 | 0.0464 | |
| iAN+RN+FN | Range | 1.0526 | 0.8245 | 1.0571 | 1.0515 | 0.8896 | 1.0982 |
| SD | 0.0549 | 0.0468 | 0.0556 | 0.0482 | 0.0521 | 0.0481 |
We show the range and standard deviation of the difference between log ratios (base 2) estimated from the same spot in different dye-flip pairs.