Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
. 1995 May;2(3):337–342. doi: 10.1128/cdli.2.3.337-342.1995

Comparison of the effects of Ficoll-Hypaque separation and whole blood lysis on results of immunophenotypic analysis of blood and bone marrow samples from patients with hematologic malignancies.

K R Tamul 1, J L Schmitz 1, K Kane 1, J D Folds 1
PMCID: PMC170156  PMID: 7545079

Abstract

We compared flow cytometric immunophenotyping results obtained by using the lysed whole blood method of sample preparation with those obtained by using Ficoll-Hypaque-separated cells on 44 consecutive specimens from patients with various hematologic malignancies. When the samples were analyzed as a group, seven antigens (CD2, CD3, CD5, CD11c, CD20, CD22, and CD34) demonstrated significantly different percentages of positively staining cells. When the samples were grouped by disease, results for patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia were discordant for CD22 and HLA-DR and results for patients with hairy cell leukemia were discordant for CD34. Most of the differences, however, were not with antigens critical to the evaluation of the malignancy. Additionally, the most frequent reason for differences in the percentage of positive cells was due to isotype control-based placement of the quadrant markers and not an actual discrepancy in staining. However, analysis of the CD34 antigen yielded eight instances in which staining of Ficoll-Hypaque-separated cells was essentially negative, but a clearly positive population was evident with the lysed preparation. This finding has important implications because of the prognostic significance of this antigen. Further studies are needed to determine the cause of this phenomenon.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (206.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Ashmore L. M., Shopp G. M., Edwards B. S. Lymphocyte subset analysis by flow cytometry. Comparison of three different staining techniques and effects of blood storage. J Immunol Methods. 1989 Mar 31;118(2):209–215. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(89)90008-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Borowitz M. J., Shuster J. J., Civin C. I., Carroll A. J., Look A. T., Behm F. G., Land V. J., Pullen D. J., Crist W. M. Prognostic significance of CD34 expression in childhood B-precursor acute lymphocytic leukemia: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1990 Aug;8(8):1389–1398. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.8.1389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. De Paoli P., Reitano M., Battistin S., Castiglia C., Santini G. Enumeration of human lymphocyte subsets by monoclonal antibodies and flow cytometry: a comparative study using whole blood or mononuclear cells separated by density gradient centrifugation. J Immunol Methods. 1984 Sep 4;72(2):349–353. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(84)90003-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. De Paoli P., Villalta D., Battistin S., Gasparollo A., Santini G. Selective loss of OKT8 lymphocytes on density gradient centrifugation separation of blood mononuclear cells. J Immunol Methods. 1983 Jul 15;61(2):259–260. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(83)90170-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Drach J., Drach D., Glassl H., Gattringer C., Huber H. Flow cytometric determination of atypical antigen expression in acute leukemia for the study of minimal residual disease. Cytometry. 1992;13(8):893–901. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990130813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kamat D., Laszewski M. J., Kemp J. D., Goeken J. A., Lutz C. T., Platz C. E., Dick F. R. The diagnostic utility of immunophenotyping and immunogenotyping in the pathologic evaluation of lymphoid proliferations. Mod Pathol. 1990 Mar;3(2):105–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Michalevicz R., Baron S., Brill S., Sahar E. Characterization of lympho-myeloid-erythroid-megakaryocytic stem cells in peripheral blood of hairy cell leukemia patients. Leuk Res. 1989;13(10):915–920. doi: 10.1016/0145-2126(89)90045-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Neubauer A., van Lessen A., Huhn D. Einfluss der Methode auf das Ergebnis der Bestimmung von T-Zellsubpopulationen. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1989 Mar 17;114(11):414–416. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1066610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pui C. H., Behm F. G., Crist W. M. Clinical and biologic relevance of immunologic marker studies in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 1993 Jul 15;82(2):343–362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Renzi P., Ginns L. C. Analysis of T cell subsets in normal adults. Comparison of whole blood lysis technique to Ficoll-Hypaque separation by flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 1987 Apr 2;98(1):53–56. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(87)90434-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Romeu M. A., Mestre M., González L., Valls A., Verdaguer J., Corominas M., Bas J., Massip E., Buendia E. Lymphocyte immunophenotyping by flow cytometry in normal adults. Comparison of fresh whole blood lysis technique, Ficoll-Paque separation and cryopreservation. J Immunol Methods. 1992 Sep 18;154(1):7–10. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(92)90206-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Tamul K. R., O'Gorman M. R., Donovan M., Schmitz J. L., Folds J. D. Comparison of a lysed whole blood method to purified cell preparations for lymphocyte immunophenotyping: differences between healthy controls and HIV-positive specimens. J Immunol Methods. 1994 Jan 3;167(1-2):237–243. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(94)90092-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES