Skip to main content
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
. 1995 Sep;2(5):623–625. doi: 10.1128/cdli.2.5.623-625.1995

A manual bead assay for the determination of absolute CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte counts in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals.

A V Carella 1, M W Moss 1, V Provost 1, T C Quinn 1
PMCID: PMC170209  PMID: 8548544

Abstract

CD4+ T lymphocytes are currently the most common surrogate marker indicating disease progression in individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Since the cost of enumerating lymphocyte phenotypes is quite high, an inexpensive bead assay analyzed by light microscopy (cytosphere assay; Coulter Corporation, Hialeah, Fla.) was developed as an alternative method for counting CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. To evaluate the reliability of the cytosphere assay, heparinized blood was collected from 117 HIV-infected individuals and tested for both CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes by flow cytometry and the cytosphere assay. The Pearson correlation coefficient of the cytosphere assay compared with that of flow cytometry for CD4+ T lymphocytes was 0.93, with mean values +/- standard deviations of 534 +/- 509 by flow cytometry and 499 +/- 477 by the cytosphere assay. The correlation coefficient for CD8+ T lymphocytes was 0.86, with mean values of 831 +/- 543 by flow cytometry and 746 +/- 472 by the cytosphere assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the cytosphere assay in determining absolute CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts of less than 200/microliters were 97.6 and 94.7%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 90.9%, and the negative predictive value was 98.6%. The cytosphere assay was highly correlative to flow cytometry in determining CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocyte counts among HIV-infected patients. The ease and limited resources needed to perform this test make it ideal in developing countries and other areas where technology and finances are limited.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (161.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Fahey J. L., Taylor J. M., Detels R., Hofmann B., Melmed R., Nishanian P., Giorgi J. V. The prognostic value of cellular and serologic markers in infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1. N Engl J Med. 1990 Jan 18;322(3):166–172. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199001183220305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gazzard B. G. When should asymptomatic patients with HIV infection be treated with zidovudine? BMJ. 1992 Feb 22;304(6825):456–457. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6825.456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hoover D. R., Graham N. M., Chen B., Taylor J. M., Phair J., Zhou S. Y., Muñoz A. Effect of CD4+ cell count measurement variability on staging HIV-1 infection. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1992;5(8):794–802. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Landay A., Ho J. L., Hom D., Russell T., Zwerner R., Minuty J. G., Kataaha P., Mmiro F., Jackson B. A rapid manual method for CD4+ T-cell quantitation for use in developing countries. AIDS. 1993 Dec;7(12):1565–1568. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199312000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Masur H., Ognibene F. P., Yarchoan R., Shelhamer J. H., Baird B. F., Travis W., Suffredini A. F., Deyton L., Kovacs J. A., Falloon J. CD4 counts as predictors of opportunistic pneumonias in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Aug 1;111(3):223–231. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-111-3-223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES